Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37750959›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2023

Histopathological assessment of depth of coagulation necrosis with Holmium, Moses, and Thulium fiber lasers in human prostate tissue.

Hemendra Navinchandra Shah, Maria Camila Suarez Arbelaez, Khushi Shah, Joao Porto, Dimple Kumar Chanamolu, Ruben Blachman-Braun, Mohammad Hout, Nicholas A Smith, Oleksii A Iakymenko, Oleksandr N Kryvenko

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hemendra Navinchandra ShahDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. drhemendrashah@yahoo.co.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4273-5502
Maria Camila Suarez ArbelaezDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Khushi ShahDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Joao PortoDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Dimple Kumar ChanamoluDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Ruben Blachman-BraunDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Mohammad HoutDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Nicholas A SmithDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Oleksii A IakymenkoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Oleksandr N KryvenkoDesai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
University of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate coagulation necrosis depth (CND) of Holmium (HL), Moses (ML), and Thulium fiber laser (TFL) in ex vivo human prostate tissue at various energy settings.

methodsAfter endoscopic HL enucleation, small prostate tissue fragments were removed from the bladder with graspers and used for study. Immediately after surgery, a single incision was made on the surface of the tissue kept under normal saline at room temperature using a hand-held 550-µm laser fiber. Variable energy settings were tested for all three lasers. Two pathologists measured the CND with light microscopy using ocular micrometer. Impact of various laser settings on CND was analyzed. The differences in CND of all three lasers at similar laser power were compared.

resultsMean CND was 0.56 ± 0.53 mm for long-pulse HL, 0.54 ± 0.53 mm for ML, 0.67 ± 0.67 mm for low-pulse TFL, and 0.81 ± 0.78 mm for high-pulse TFL. There was no significant difference between mean CND of HL and ML at various laser settings ranging from 10 to 120 W and CND with long- and short-pulse settings of TFL at settings from 10 to 60 W. There was a trend of increasing CND in HL and ML with increasing laser power; however, it was not statistically significant. TFL had similar tissue effects as HL and ML.

conclusionThere is no significant difference in CND of HL, ML, and TFL in ex vivo human prostate tissue. Other factors besides laser type and settings need to be studied to explain clinical differences among various lasers used for prostate enucleation.

Indexed as

Lasers, Solid-StateLaser TherapyLithotripsy, LaserHolmiumHumansMaleProstateThuliumHolmiumThuliumCoagulation depthEnucleationHoLEPLaser–tissue interactionMosesProstatectomyThulium fiber laser

Identifiers

PMID37750959
OpenAlexW4387033884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.