Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37750957›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Principles of oncology taught in a one-week course.

Matthias Oettle, Marcel Büttner, Marie Forster, Laura Gajdi, Johannes Mücke, Alexander Nieto, Sonja Heuser, Johanna Huber, Franziska Walter, Stefanie Corradini and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Implementing a Novel "Frontiers in Neoplasia" Curriculum to Engage Fourth-Year Medical Students in Evidence-Based, Multidisciplinary Oncology Care.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  2. Hemato-oncological outpatient care in medical education: a German pilot-project.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Matthias OettleInstitute of Medical Education, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marcel BüttnerInstitute of Medical Education, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marie ForsterInstitute of Medical Education, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Laura GajdiInstitute of Medical Education, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Johannes MückeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexander NietoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sonja HeuserInstitute of Medical Education, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Johanna HuberInstitute of Medical Education, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Franziska WalterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stefanie CorradiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Maximilian NiyaziDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Claus BelkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Martin DreylingDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Martin R FischerInstitute of Medical Education, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Daniel F FleischmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. Daniel.Fleischmann@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrowing challenges in oncology require evolving educational methods and content. International efforts to reform oncology education are underway. Hands-on, interdisciplinary, and compact course formats have shown great effectiveness in the education of medical students. Our aim was to establish a new interdisciplinary one-week course on the principles of oncology using state-of-the-art teaching methods.

methodsIn an initial survey, medical students of LMU Munich were questioned about their current level of knowledge on the principles of oncology. In a second two-stage survey, the increase in knowledge resulting from our recently established interdisciplinary one-week course was determined.

resultsThe medical students' knowledge of clinically important oncological topics, such as the diagnostic workup and interdisciplinary treatment options, showed a need for improvement. Knowledge of the major oncological entities was also in an expandable state. By attending the one-week course on the principles of oncology, students improved their expertise in all areas of the clinical workup in oncology and had the opportunity to close previous knowledge gaps. In addition, students were able to gain more in-depth clinical knowledge on the most common oncological entities.

conclusionThe interdisciplinary one-week course on the principles of oncology proved to be an effective teaching method to expand the knowledge of the future physicians to an appropriate level. With its innovative and interdisciplinary approach, the one-week course could be used as a showcase project for the ongoing development of medical education in Germany.

Indexed as

Medical OncologyGermanyHumansEducationOncologyOne-week course

Identifiers

PMID37750957
PMCPMC10657289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.