ArticleThe British journal of radiology2023
Real-time MRI of the moving wrist at 0.55 tesla.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improved dynamic MRI of the wrist and heart at 0.55 T enabled by rapid 3D printed flexible coils.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Extending real-time MRI of the oral cavity using simultaneous multislice and compressed sensing.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- High-resolution volumetric dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist using an 8-channel flexible receive coil.Skeletal radiology · 2025Article
- Three Dimensional Real-Time MRI for the Comprehensive Evaluation of Wrist Kinematics.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- Regulation of AI algorithms for clinical decision support: a personal opinion.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024Article
- New clinical opportunities of low-field MRI: heart, lung, body, and musculoskeletal.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using 1.5T or 3.0T systems is routinely employed for assessing wrist pathology; however, due to off-resonance artifacts and high power deposition, these high-field systems have drawbacks for real-time (RT) imaging of the moving wrist. Recently, high-performance 0.55T MRI systems have become available. In this proof-of-concept study, we tested the hypothesis that RT-MRI during continuous, active, and uninterrupted wrist motion is feasible with a high-performance 0.55T system at temporal resolutions below 100 ms and that the resulting images provide visualization of tissues commonly interrogated for assessing dynamic wrist instability.
methodsParticipants were scanned during uninterrupted wrist radial-ulnar deviation and clenched fist maneuvers. Resulting images (nominal temporal resolution of 12.7-164.6 ms per image) were assessed for image quality. Feasibility of static MRI to supplement RT-MRI acquisition was also tested.
resultsThe RT images with temporal resolutions < 100 ms demonstrated low distortion and image artifacts, and higher reader assessment scores. Static MRI scans showed the ability to assess anatomical structures of interest in the wrist.
conclusionRT-MRI of the wrist at a high temporal resolution, coupled with static MRI, is feasible with a high-performance 0.55T system, and may enable improved assessment of wrist dynamic dysfunction and instability. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Real-time MRI of the moving wrist is feasible with high-performance 0.55T and may improve the evaluation of dynamic dysfunction of the wrist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.