Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37750891›Full record

ReviewChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2024

Endoluminal flow diversion as a primary treatment strategy for pediatric traumatic intracranial aneurysms: a case-based review of literature.

Ehsan Mohammad Hosseini, Saber Zafarshamspour, Mohammad Ghasemi-Rad, Goetz Benndorf, Alireza Rasekhi, Reza Rafieossadat

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ehsan Mohammad HosseiniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9786-9954
Saber ZafarshamspourDepartment of Surgery, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Kerman, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0124-3752
Mohammad Ghasemi-RadDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6763-900X
Goetz BenndorfDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9824-6900
Alireza RasekhiDepartment of Radiology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Reza RafieossadatDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. rrafieossadat@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3754-5798
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRBaylor College of Medicine · USRafsanjan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraumatic intracranial aneurysms (TICAs) constitute a notable portion of pediatric intracranial aneurysms. Their unstable structure dictates a high incidence of rupture or mass effect from enlarging unruptured aneurysms, necessitating prompt diagnosis and treatment. TICAs often lack a true neck or are wide-necked, making them unsuitable for coil embolization and surgical clipping, and their fragile nature poses a risk of rupture during surgical and intrasaccular interventions. Endoluminal flow diverters (FD), deployed without requiring direct access to the aneurysmal sac, have emerged as an appealing sole treatment modality for TICAs. However, the clinical experience with this technique remains limited in the pediatric population.

methodWe describe the successful treatment of a paraclinoid TICA in a 4-year-old female using an endoluminal FD alone. Additionally, we conducted a literature review to assess the safety and effectiveness of this treatment modality in pediatric TICAs.

resultsEndoluminal flow diversion led to complete aneurysm obliteration in our case, with no observed complication, at the 9-month follow-up. Our review of the previously reported pediatric TICAs managed by standalone flow diversion highlights this technique as safe, efficient, and promising as a sole treatment modality, particularly in the anterior circulation, with a high rate of persistent total obliteration and a low rate of complications. However, the requirement for long-term antiplatelet therapy with the possibility of frequent dose monitoring and adjustments warrants special attention when using endoluminal FDs. Until guidelines specifically addressing optimal antiplatelet therapy in children with intracranial FDs are formulated, adherence to existing protocols is imperative to avoid in-stent thrombosis.

conclusionOur literature review and personal experience indicate that endoluminal flow diversion can be a viable treatment approach for pediatric TICAs. However, prospective studies with extensive follow-ups are required to assess the durability of endoluminal FDs in treating pediatric TICAs, considering the long life expectancy of this demographic.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesStentsTreatment OutcomePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsEndovascular techniquesFlow diversionFREDIntracranial aneurysmPediatricTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID37750891
OpenAlexW4387033724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.