ArticleThe British journal of radiology2023
Evaluating the use of vacuum-assisted excisions in the management of B3 breast lesions.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Excision of B3 Breast Lesions: Reducing Overtreatment Without Compromising Safety.European journal of breast health · 2026Article
- Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Lobular In Situ Neoplasm: High-Risk Lesions Challenging Breast Cancer Prevention.Cancers · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the use of vacuum-assisted excisions (VAEs) in the management of B3 lesions within a single UK breast care centre. Assessment was made by determining the upgrade rates of the different B3 lesions at VAE. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study population comprised all patients who had a B3 result and subsequently underwent a VAE between November 2016 and October 2021. Patients with ipsilateral cancers were excluded. Retrospective biopsy and VAE results were reviewed. Upgrade rates and confidence intervals were calculated, and statistical significance was tested to determine any differences between upgrade rates of the B3 groups.
results480 VAEs for B3 lesions were performed, with 10 excluded. Overall upgrade rate was 5%. 87.5% of upgrades were to non-invasive disease. Atypical intraductal epithelial proliferation (AIDEP) had a 15% upgrade rate, significantly different to lobular neoplasia (2%), papilloma without atypia (0%), and radial scar without atypia (0%). 10% of B3 lesions with atypia were upgraded, significantly different to 0% of B3 lesions without atypia. B3 lesions diagnosed by vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) had a significantly higher upgrade rate of 8% compared with 2% for lesions diagnosed by core biopsy (CBX), although this result was impacted by high numbers of AIDEP diagnosed by VAB.
conclusionsThe results suggest using VAE for the management of AIDEP is appropriate. However, they also indicate that by performing VAEs of papillomas and radial scars without atypia, overtreatment may be occurring. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study adds to the ongoing discussion on the best treatment of B3 breast lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.