Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37750736›Full record

ReviewPrimary health care research & development2023

Patient and primary care practitioners' perspectives on consultations for fibromyalgia: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Ailish Byrne, Katherine Jones, Michael Backhouse, Fiona Rose, Emma Moatt, Christina van der Feltz-Cornelis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Primary health care research & development, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. "Food as Friend or Enemy": A Qualitative Study of Motivations Underlying Restrictive Dietary Practices in Fibromyalgia.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ailish ByrneYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5656-5674
Katherine JonesWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0615-8442
Michael BackhouseWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0056-8467
Fiona Rose *York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0587-683X
Emma Moatt *York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7216-1511
Christina van der Feltz-CornelisMental Health and Addictions Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, Hull York Medical School, University of York, Heslington, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6925-8956
University of York · GBUniversity of Warwick · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFibromyalgia presents a challenge to both the patients experiencing symptoms and the staff aiming to treat them. This qualitative review aimed to synthesise how patients and practitioners experience primary care consultations, develop a rounded picture of how they perceive each other, the challenges to primary care consultation and how they might be tackled.

methodsCINAHL, Embase, CENTRAL and Medline were searched from inception to November 2021. Qualitative studies were included if they explored the perspectives and experiences of either fibromyalgia patients or primary care practitioners. Quantitative data, studies not published in English, not set in primary care or that did not distinguish the type of patient or clinician were excluded. Included studies were analysed using thematic synthesis and their quality assessed.

resultsIn total, 30 studies met the inclusion criteria. Thematic synthesis identified three overarching themes: (1) life turned upside down - exploring the chaos experienced by patients as they seek help; (2) negative cycle - highlighting how patient and practitioner factors can create a detrimental cycle; and (3) breaking the cycle - validating patient-doctor relationships underpinned by clear communication can help break the negative cycle.

conclusionsFibromyalgia patients experience uncertainty and chaos that can clash with the attitudes of GPs and the help they can feasibly provide. Difficult consultations in which neither the GP nor patient are satisfied can easily occur. Promoting supportive, reciprocal and open patient-doctor relationships is essential. Future research is required to further explore GP attitudes and to develop an intervention that could improve consultations, patient outcomes and GP satisfaction.

Indexed as

FibromyalgiaCommunicationHumansPatientsPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationfibromyalgiaGP perspectivespatient perspectivesprimary care consultationsqualitative evidence synthesis

Identifiers

PMID37750736
PMCPMC10540196
OpenAlexW4387033667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.