Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37750599›Full record

ReviewJournal of evolutionary biology2023

Assessing co-diversification in host-associated microbiomes.

Andrew H Moeller, Jon G Sanders, Daniel D Sprockett, Abigail Landers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of evolutionary biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Fidelity in co-diversified symbiosis.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Ecology and evolution of the social microbiome.Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew H MoellerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8377-4647
Jon G SandersDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Daniel D SprockettDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Abigail LandersDepartment of Microbiology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.

Funding

Uncovering the modes and genetics of gut bacterial transmissionR35GM138284 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Andrew Moeller · 2020 to 2026
$2.4M
Host-Microbe Interactions that Determine Host Traits and DiseaseT32AI145821 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI LAZZARO, BRIAN · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI145821NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138284NIGMS NIH HHS R35GM138284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When lineages of hosts and microbial symbionts engage in intimate interactions over evolutionary timescales, they can diversify in parallel (i.e., co-diversify), producing associations between the lineages' phylogenetic histories. Tests for co-diversification of individual microbial lineages and their hosts have been developed previously, and these have been applied to discover ancient symbioses in diverse branches of the tree of life. However, most host-microbe relationships are not binary but multipartite, in that a single host-associated microbiota can contain many microbial lineages, generating challenges for assessing co-diversification. Here, we review recent evidence for co-diversification in complex microbiota, highlight the limitations of prior studies, and outline a hypothesis testing approach designed to overcome some of these limitations. We advocate for the use of microbiota-wide scans for co-diversifying symbiont lineages and discuss tools developed for this purpose. Tests for co-diversification for simple host symbiont systems can be extended to entire phylogenies of microbial lineages (e.g., metagenome-assembled or isolate genomes, amplicon sequence variants) sampled from host clades, thereby providing a means for identifying co-diversifying symbionts present within complex microbiota. The relative ages of symbiont clades can corroborate co-diversification, and multi-level permutation tests can account for multiple comparisons and phylogenetic non-independence introduced by repeated sampling of host species. Discovering co-diversifying lineages will generate powerful opportunities for interrogating the molecular evolution and lineage turnover of ancestral, host-species specific symbionts within host-associated microbiota.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionMicrobiotaEvolution, MolecularGenomePhylogenySymbiosiscoevolutioncospeciationmetagenomicsmutualismparasitism

Identifiers

PMID37750599
PMCPMC10843161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.