Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37750554›Full record

ArticlePhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP2023

Automatic identification of chemical moieties.

Jonas Lederer, Michael Gastegger, Kristof T Schütt, Michael Kampffmeyer, Klaus-Robert Müller, Oliver T Unke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Analyzing Atomic Interactions in Molecules as Learned by Neural Networks.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
  3. Generative Models as an Emerging Paradigm in the Chemical Sciences.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonas LedererBerlin Institute of Technology (TU Berlin), 10587 Berlin, Germany. jonas.lederer@tu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8224-1486
Michael GasteggerBerlin Institute of Technology (TU Berlin), 10587 Berlin, Germany. jonas.lederer@tu-berlin.de.
Kristof T SchüttBerlin Institute of Technology (TU Berlin), 10587 Berlin, Germany. jonas.lederer@tu-berlin.de.
Michael KampffmeyerDepartment of Physics and Technology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9019 Tromsø, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-0405
Klaus-Robert MüllerBerlin Institute of Technology (TU Berlin), 10587 Berlin, Germany. jonas.lederer@tu-berlin.de.
Oliver T UnkeBerlin Institute of Technology (TU Berlin), 10587 Berlin, Germany. jonas.lederer@tu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7503-406X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the prediction of quantum mechanical observables with machine learning methods has become increasingly popular. Message-passing neural networks (MPNNs) solve this task by constructing atomic representations, from which the properties of interest are predicted. Here, we introduce a method to automatically identify chemical moieties (molecular building blocks) from such representations, enabling a variety of applications beyond property prediction, which otherwise rely on expert knowledge. The required representation can either be provided by a pretrained MPNN, or be learned from scratch using only structural information. Beyond the data-driven design of molecular fingerprints, the versatility of our approach is demonstrated by enabling the selection of representative entries in chemical databases, the automatic construction of coarse-grained force fields, as well as the identification of reaction coordinates.

Identifiers

PMID37750554
PMCPMC10548786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.