ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant women and pregnancy outcomes: A historical cohort in center of Iran.
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effectiveness and Influence of COVID-19 Vaccination on Perinatal Individuals and Their Newborns: An Updated Meta-Analysis.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStarting vaccination in pregnant women; numerous theories have been proposed that the vaccine might affect the mother or the fetus.
objectiveThe goal of this research was to see whether there was a link between the Sinopharm vaccination and certain pregnancy outcomes in COVID-19-vaccinated women. STUDY
designThis is a retrospective cohort study.
methodThis study was conducted on pregnant women who delivered from 1 August 2021 to 1 January 2022 in Yazd city. We have followed the STROBE Guidelines when preparing the manuscript. In this period time, all pregnant women were 5787 people in which 5666 were in the second and third trimester. Among these women, 1222 women were randomly selected.
resultsAmong 1222 pregnant women, 558 (45.6%) women had received one dose vaccine, 162 (13.3%) people had received two doses, and 502 (41.1%) women had not been vaccinated. On crude analysis, there was no significant difference between vaccinated and non-vaccinated groups. After adjusting for maternal age, maternal body mass index, parity, stillbirth history, abortion history, and gestational diabetes in multivariate analysis, no differences were found between the groups in pregnancy as well.
conclusionVaccinations during pregnancy seem to have no negative effects on the mother or the baby. This finding may aid pregnant women in deciding whether or not to take the vaccination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.