ArticleKorean journal of anesthesiology2023
Predicting optimal endotracheal tube size and depth in pediatric patients using demographic data and machine learning techniques.
Article in Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Selection of endotracheal tube size and insertion depth according to pediatric growth charts and physique in Japan.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Concordance Between Anthropometric Formula Predictions and Chest Radiograph-Confirmed Endotracheal Tube Depth in Young Infants: A Retrospective Cohort Study from Saudi Arabia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- An Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Neuroanesthesia.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Identifying sex-specific predictors of frailty in Korean community-dwelling older adults using interpretable machine learning.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Anesthesia: A Structured Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- AI-based decision models for difficult airway assessment: from research innovation to clinical implementation-a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in anesthesiology: a bibliometric analysis.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2024Review
- The development of prediction model for cuffed tracheal tube size from the middle finger in pediatrics: a concise and feasible approach.Translational pediatrics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUse of endotracheal tubes (ETTs) with appropriate size and depth can help minimize intubation-related complications in pediatric patients. Existing age-based formulae for selecting the optimal ETT size present several inaccuracies. We developed a machine learning model that predicts the optimal size and depth of ETTs in pediatric patients using demographic data, enabling clinical applications.
methodsData from 37,057 patients younger than 12 years who underwent general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were retrospectively analyzed. Gradient boosted regression tree (GBRT) model was developed and compared with traditional age-based formulae.
resultsThe GBRT model demonstrated the highest macro-averaged F1 scores of 0.502 (95% CI 0.486, 0.568) and 0.669 (95% CI 0.640, 0.694) for predicting the uncuffed and cuffed ETT size (internal diameter [ID]), outperforming the age-based formulae that yielded 0.163 (95% CI 0.140, 0.196, P < 0.001) and 0.392 (95% CI 0.378, 0.406, P < 0.001), respectively. In predicting the ETT depth (distance from tip to lip corner), the GBRT model showed the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.71 cm (95% CI 0.69, 0.72) and 0.72 cm (95% CI 0.70, 0.74) compared to the age-based formulae that showed an error of 1.18 cm (95% CI 1.16, 1.20, P < 0.001) and 1.34 cm (95% CI 1.31, 1.38, P < 0.001) for uncuffed and cuffed ETT, respectively.
conclusionsThe GBRT model using only demographic data accurately predicted the ETT size and depth. If these results are validated, the model may be practical for predicting optimal ETT size and depth for pediatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.