Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37750117›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Assessing Variability in Reporting Severity of the Same Symptom (Fatigue) in the Context of Different Psychiatric Syndromes.

Maya Subramanian, Timothy McAuliffe, Himanshu Agrawal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maya SubramanianCollege of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Timothy McAuliffePsychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Himanshu AgrawalPsychiatry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study is to examine the variability in the self-reported fatigue symptom severity in major depressive disorder (MDD) compared to generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted of 100 patients evaluated for fatigue using depression and anxiety questionnaires. The study examined whether ratings of fatigue varied based on whether fatigue was being rated by the patient in the context of MDD vs. when fatigue was being rated by the same patient in the context of GAD. A related-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the median differences between depression and anxiety fatigue scores. The significance level used was 0.05. Results This study found a statistically significant difference in the median difference of the paired depression fatigue and anxiety fatigue scores (depression score - anxiety score) regardless of the order of administration (Wilcoxon signed-rank test statistic = 135.500, p-value =.008, N = 100 paired scores). Conclusion The study's conclusions show that although the symptom of fatigue is listed in the Diagnostic Statistical Manual 5 (DSM-5) criteria for MDD as well as GAD, it may be perceived by patients differently based on the context of the syndrome. This emphasizes the importance of considering the context of symptom reporting in patients with MDD and GAD to improve diagnostic methodologies and treatment strategies.

Indexed as

clinical psychiatryfatigue scalesgeneral anxiety disordermajor depression disorderpsychiatry and mental health

Identifiers

PMID37750117
PMCPMC10518187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.