Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37750084›Full record

Trial reportClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2023

Participant Reported Improvement in Cellulite by Vari-Pad Apparel and Objective Measurements - A "First Use" Pilot Study.

Melissa J Kiely, Ashleigh Poulsen, Simon D Muschamp, Chloe Sallis, Mark S Whiteley

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05748678 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Cell-u-Light Apparel in Enhancing Lymph Drainage and Improving the Appearance of Grades of Cellulite in Affected Participants

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Whiteley ClinicRan2023 to 2023Enrolled24ConditionsCelluliteArmsCompression pants
NCT05959681 naunknown statusnot on this map

Longitudinal Trial Assessing Cellulite in Women Wearing a New Compression Garment - One Side With Ink Printed Micro-pads ("Vari-pads") and One Side Without.

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Whiteley ClinicRan2023 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsCelluliteArmsCompression garment with Vari-pad microdots ink-printed on inside.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melissa J KielyResearch Department, the Whiteley Clinic, Guildford, Surrey, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8663-6127
Ashleigh PoulsenResearch Department, the Whiteley Clinic, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
Simon D MuschampResearch Department, the Whiteley Clinic, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
Chloe SallisResearch Department, the Whiteley Clinic, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
Mark S WhiteleyResearch Department, the Whiteley Clinic, Guildford, Surrey, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6727-6245
Whiteley Clinic · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cellulite affects 80-90% of post-pubertal females and, although cosmetic, has proven adverse psychological effects. A new compression garment with patented "vari-pad" technology has been developed, aiming to stimulate lymphatic return from the buttocks and thighs. The primary aim of this small pilot study was to assess participant satisfaction after using this garment in the short term and secondarily, to look for any objective improvements. Methods: Eighteen female participants (mean 47.5y, range 26-60) completed the study. There were 2 weeks of "stabilisation", 4 weeks of wearing the garment, and 2 weeks of further assessment. With the initial assessment, there were 9 visits for each participant. At each visit, weight, participant satisfaction (0-10), 3D images (Canfield, USA) and transcutaneous water content (LymphScanner, Delfin Technologies, Finland) and comfort (0-10) were recorded. Results: There was no significant weight change in any of the participants during the trial period. After 4 weeks of wearing the garment, there was a significant improvement in participant satisfaction of their cellulite (n = 15, p = 0.0036) with a mean improvement of 18.5%. 3D image analysis of dimple volume showed no significant change in buttock cellulite, a significant decrease in left thigh cellulite (n = 17, p = 0.0123), but not on the right (n = 14, p = 0.6890). There was a significant decrease of localised water (n = 36, p = 0.0041). Comfort was 86% (range 40-100%) and there were no adverse reactions to the garment. Conclusion: The vari-padded compression garment produced a significant improvement in participant satisfaction after just 4 weeks of treatment. Objective measurements failed to show a significant difference in cellulite on the buttocks but showed a significant improvement in the thighs by analysis of both dimple volumes and reduced transcutaneous water measurements. Further study is suggested to demonstrate if longer timeframes for use of the apparel will lead to further significant improvement in the appearance of cellulite. NCT Number: NCT05748678.

Indexed as

cellulitecompressiongarmenthosiery

Identifiers

PMID37750084
PMCPMC10518180
OpenAlexW4386898140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.