Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37750066›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2023

Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Remimazolam Tosilate Applied in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Trial.

Xiaozhen Cui, Zhi Cheng, Han Li, Xiaobao Zhang, Hengfei Luan, Zhibin Zhao, Pin Zhu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sedation in endoscopy: Finding the balance between safety and efficacy.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaozhen CuiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Graduate Training Base of Lianyungang First People's Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Zhi ChengDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Han LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Xiaobao ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Hengfei LuanDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Zhibin ZhaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Pin ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Remimazolam is a novel benzodiazepine narcotic. When used for gastrointestinal endoscopy or bronchoscopy, it provides adequate sedation and rapid recovery. However, studies on the optimal initial loading dose of remimazolam remain inadequate. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of different doses of remimazolam applied in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods: A total of 218 patients scheduled for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were included in our trial and divided into experimental and control groups: the experimental groups were the remimazolam groups (R1 of 0.2 mg/kg, R2 of 0.3 mg/kg, and R3 of 0.4 mg/kg), and the control group was the propofol group. Following a single injection of trial drugs during the induction period, operational requirements were evaluated based on MOAA/S scores. When the sedation was successfully achieved, safety was evaluated based on the incidence of various intraoperative and postoperative adverse events. Results: The success rates of intraoperative sedation were 82% in group R1, 98% in group R2, 96% in group R3, and 100% in group P. The incidence of hypotension was lower in the remimazolam groups than in the propofol group (16%), 4% in group R1, 6% in group R2, and 6% in group R3. The incidence of postoperative vertigo was significantly higher, and sedation recovery time was prolonged in high-concentration remimazolam group. Conclusion: Satisfactory efficacy can be obtained with higher concentrations of remimazolam tosilate in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with ASA grade I or II. However, as the dose is progressively increased, the incidence of adverse reactions by remimazolam tosilate are also significantly increased, such as vertigo and prolonged sedation recovery time. Trial Registration: The trial was registered prior to enrollment at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR 2000032067).

Indexed as

PropofolBenzenesulfonatesBenzodiazepinesHumansProspective Studies4-methylbenzenesulfonic acidBenzenesulfonatesBenzodiazepinesPropofolremimazolamhypotensionhypoxemiaremimazolamsedationupper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID37750066
PMCPMC10518149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.