Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2023
Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Remimazolam Tosilate Applied in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Trial.
Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Propofol Versus Remimazolam in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of remimazolam in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- The safety and efficacy of remimazolam, ciprofol, and propofol anesthesia in endoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam in Short Endoscopic Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Optimal remimazolam dosage for pediatric painless gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial comparing efficacy and safety of three doses combined with sufentanil and propofol.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- Effect of Lidocaine Spray on the Sedative Dose of Remimazolam During Gastroscopy in Adults: A Prospective, Randomized Dose-Response Trial Using an Up-Down Sequential Allocation Method.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Remimazolam-Remifentanil versus Propofol-Remifentanil for Spontaneous Ventilation During Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Current medical science · 2025Trial
- Pharmacodynamics study of remimazolam besylate in anxious patients undergoing gastroscopy: a biased-coin design up-and-down sequential allocation trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Remimazolam-etomidate versus remimazolam-propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy: A randomized controlled trial.PloS one · 2025Trial
- Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus remimazolam combined with alfentanil for sedation during outpatient colonoscopy: a randomized double-blind noninferiority trial.Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier) · 2026Article
- Article
- The 90% effective dose of remimazolam in combination with sufentanil for sedation in patients undergoing gastroscopy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Sedation in endoscopy: Finding the balance between safety and efficacy.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- Article
- Remimazolam for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A comprehensive review.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Review
- The efficacy and safety of remimazolam in painless colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Remimazolam Pilot for Office-Based Dental Sedation: Adverse Events, Awareness and Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Remimazolam is a novel benzodiazepine narcotic. When used for gastrointestinal endoscopy or bronchoscopy, it provides adequate sedation and rapid recovery. However, studies on the optimal initial loading dose of remimazolam remain inadequate. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of different doses of remimazolam applied in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods: A total of 218 patients scheduled for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were included in our trial and divided into experimental and control groups: the experimental groups were the remimazolam groups (R1 of 0.2 mg/kg, R2 of 0.3 mg/kg, and R3 of 0.4 mg/kg), and the control group was the propofol group. Following a single injection of trial drugs during the induction period, operational requirements were evaluated based on MOAA/S scores. When the sedation was successfully achieved, safety was evaluated based on the incidence of various intraoperative and postoperative adverse events. Results: The success rates of intraoperative sedation were 82% in group R1, 98% in group R2, 96% in group R3, and 100% in group P. The incidence of hypotension was lower in the remimazolam groups than in the propofol group (16%), 4% in group R1, 6% in group R2, and 6% in group R3. The incidence of postoperative vertigo was significantly higher, and sedation recovery time was prolonged in high-concentration remimazolam group. Conclusion: Satisfactory efficacy can be obtained with higher concentrations of remimazolam tosilate in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with ASA grade I or II. However, as the dose is progressively increased, the incidence of adverse reactions by remimazolam tosilate are also significantly increased, such as vertigo and prolonged sedation recovery time. Trial Registration: The trial was registered prior to enrollment at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR 2000032067).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.