ArticleThe plant genome2023
Genomic selection of soybean (Glycine max) for genetic improvement of yield and seed composition in a breeding context.
Article in The plant genome, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficiency under epistasis of haplotype-based genomic selection for pure line breeding.Heredity · 2026Article
- A breeding strategy for high-oleic acid content and high-yield peanut using Tag SNPs and genomic selection.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- The current state of Japanese soybean breeding using DNA marker technology.Breeding science · 2026Article
- Article
- Genomic prediction for grain yield and biotic stress resistance in field pea (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Integrated Pest Management of Sclerotinia Stem Rot in Soybean: Current Strategies and Future Prospects.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Identifying canopy wilting QTLs and evaluating remote sensing approaches for selecting drought-tolerant soybean.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Article
- Genomic and phenomic prediction for soybean seed yield, protein, and oil.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Genome-Wide Association Study on Imputed Genotypes of 180 Eurasian SoybeanPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Soybean genomics research community strategic plan: A vision for 2024-2028.The plant genome · 2024Article
- Advances in Soybean Genetic Improvement.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Development and implementation of nested single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assays for breeding and genetic research applications.The plant genome · 2024Article
- Genetic mapping reveals the complex genetic architecture controlling slow canopy wilting in soybean.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024Article
- Selective Genotyping and Phenotyping for Optimization of Genomic Prediction Models for Populations with Different Diversity.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) for Sucrose and Protein Content in Soybean Seed.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Genomic selection of soybean (Glycine max) for genetic improvement of yield and seed composition in a breeding context.The plant genome · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic selection has been utilized for genetic improvement in both plant and animal breeding and is a favorable technique for quantitative trait development. Within this study, genomic selection was evaluated within a breeding program, using novel validation methods in addition to plant materials and data from a commercial soybean (Glycine max) breeding program. A total of 1501 inbred lines were used to test multiple genomic selection models for multiple traits. Validation included cross-validation, inter-environment, and empirical validation. The results indicated that the extended genomic best linear unbiased prediction (EGBLUP) model was the most effective model tested for yield, protein, and oil in cross-validation with accuracies of 0.50, 0.68, and 0.64, respectively. Increasing marker number from 1000 to 3000 to 6000 single nucleotide polymorphism markers leads to statistically significant increases in accuracy. Cross-environment predictions were statistically lower than cross-validation with accuracies of 0.24, 0.54, and 0.42 for yield, protein, and oil, respectively, using the extended genomic BLUP model. Empirical validation, predicting the yield of 510 soybean lines, had a prediction accuracy of 0.34, with the inclusion of a maturity covariate leading to a notable increase in accuracy. Genomic selection identified high-performance lines in inter-environment predictions: 34% of lines within the upper quartile of yield, and 51% and 48% of the highest quartile protein and oil lines, respectively. Statistically similar results occurred comparing rankings in empirical validation and selection for advancements in yield trials. These results indicate that genomic selection is a useful tool for selection decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.