Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37749946›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2023

Genomic selection of soybean (Glycine max) for genetic improvement of yield and seed composition in a breeding context.

Mark J Miller, Qijian Song, Zenglu Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Identifying canopy wilting QTLs and evaluating remote sensing approaches for selecting drought-tolerant soybean.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Advances in Soybean Genetic Improvement.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Genetic mapping reveals the complex genetic architecture controlling slow canopy wilting in soybean.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark J MillerInstitute of Plant Breeding, Genetics and Genomics, and Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1532-8338
Qijian SongUSDA-ARS, Beltsville, Maryland, USA.
Zenglu LiInstitute of Plant Breeding, Genetics and Genomics, and Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4114-9509

Funding

Georgia Agricultural Experiment StationsGeorgia Seed DevelopmentUnited Soybean BoardUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection has been utilized for genetic improvement in both plant and animal breeding and is a favorable technique for quantitative trait development. Within this study, genomic selection was evaluated within a breeding program, using novel validation methods in addition to plant materials and data from a commercial soybean (Glycine max) breeding program. A total of 1501 inbred lines were used to test multiple genomic selection models for multiple traits. Validation included cross-validation, inter-environment, and empirical validation. The results indicated that the extended genomic best linear unbiased prediction (EGBLUP) model was the most effective model tested for yield, protein, and oil in cross-validation with accuracies of 0.50, 0.68, and 0.64, respectively. Increasing marker number from 1000 to 3000 to 6000 single nucleotide polymorphism markers leads to statistically significant increases in accuracy. Cross-environment predictions were statistically lower than cross-validation with accuracies of 0.24, 0.54, and 0.42 for yield, protein, and oil, respectively, using the extended genomic BLUP model. Empirical validation, predicting the yield of 510 soybean lines, had a prediction accuracy of 0.34, with the inclusion of a maturity covariate leading to a notable increase in accuracy. Genomic selection identified high-performance lines in inter-environment predictions: 34% of lines within the upper quartile of yield, and 51% and 48% of the highest quartile protein and oil lines, respectively. Statistically similar results occurred comparing rankings in empirical validation and selection for advancements in yield trials. These results indicate that genomic selection is a useful tool for selection decisions.

Indexed as

Glycine maxQuantitative Trait LociGenomicsPlant BreedingSeedsSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID37749946
PMCPMC12807242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.