ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2023
Realistic Modeling of the Electrocatalytic Process at Complex Solid-Liquid Interface.
Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bifunctional Electrocatalysts with High-Entropy Alloys: Bridging Hydrogen Evolution and Oxygen Reduction.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2026Review
- Methodological Frameworks for Computational Electrocatalysis: From Theory to Practice.Small methods · 2026Review
- Predictive Chemical Kinetic Modeling: Where We Succeed, Where We Struggle, and What Comes Next.ACS engineering Au · 2026Review
- AI-Accelerated Discovery of Electrocatalyst Materials.ACS materials Au · 2026Review
- Modeling the potential energy surface by force fields for heterogeneous catalysis: classification, applications, and challenges.Chemical science · 2025Review
- COEnergy & fuels : an American Chemical Society journal · 2025Article
- Selectivity trends in two-electron oxygen reduction: insights from two-dimensional materials.Chemical science · 2025Article
- How to Assess and Predict Electrical Double Layer Properties. Implications for Electrocatalysis.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- Ab Initio Kinetics of Electrochemical Reactions Using the Computational FcThe journal of physical chemistry. A · 2024Article
- Realistic Modeling of the Electrocatalytic Process at Complex Solid-Liquid Interface.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rational design of electrocatalysis has emerged as one of the most thriving means for mitigating energy and environmental crises. The key to this effort is the understanding of the complex electrochemical interface, wherein the electrode potential as well as various internal factors such as H-bond network, adsorbate coverage, and dynamic behavior of the interface collectively contribute to the electrocatalytic activity and selectivity. In this context, the authors have reviewed recent theoretical advances, and especially, the contributions to modeling the realistic electrocatalytic processes at complex electrochemical interfaces, and illustrated the challenges and fundamental problems in this field. Specifically, the significance of the inclusion of explicit solvation and electrode potential as well as the strategies toward the design of highly efficient electrocatalysts are discussed. The structure-activity relationships and their dynamic responses to the environment and catalytic functionality under working conditions are illustrated to be crucial factors for understanding the complexed interface and the electrocatalytic activities. It is hoped that this review can help spark new research passion and ultimately bring a step closer to a realistic and systematic modeling method for electrocatalysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.