Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37749821›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2023

Variational log-Gaussian point-process methods for grid cells.

Michael Everett Rule, Prannoy Chaudhuri-Vayalambrone, Marino Krstulovic, Marius Bauza, Julija Krupic, Timothy O'Leary

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bayesian target optimisation for high-precision holographic optogenetics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael Everett RuleEngineering Department, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4196-774X
Prannoy Chaudhuri-VayalambroneDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0009-0005-5947-7510
Marino KrstulovicDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8132-2241
Marius BauzaSainsbury Wellcome Centre, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3514-8382
Julija KrupicDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6299-1629
Timothy O'LearyEngineering Department, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1029-0158
University of Cambridge · GBSainsbury Laboratory · GB

Funding

European Research Council 716643Medical Research CouncilWellcome Trust 206682/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present practical solutions to applying Gaussian-process (GP) methods to calculate spatial statistics for grid cells in large environments. GPs are a data efficient approach to inferring neural tuning as a function of time, space, and other variables. We discuss how to design appropriate kernels for grid cells, and show that a variational Bayesian approach to log-Gaussian Poisson models can be calculated quickly. This class of models has closed-form expressions for the evidence lower-bound, and can be estimated rapidly for certain parameterizations of the posterior covariance. We provide an implementation that operates in a low-rank spatial frequency subspace for further acceleration, and demonstrate these methods on experimental data.

Indexed as

Grid CellsBayes TheoremNormal DistributionGaussian processgrid cellspoint processspatial statisticsvariational Bayesian inference

Identifiers

PMID37749821
PMCPMC10962565
OpenAlexW4387033055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.