Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37749757›Full record

ArticleBJS open2023

Identifying malnutrition in emergency general surgery: systematic review.

Daniel L Ashmore, Adil Rashid, Timothy R Wilson, Vanessa Halliday, Matthew J Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Predictive value of various nutritional assessment scores for Short-term outcomes after emergency abdominal surgery: A prospective cohort study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  4. What influences emergency general surgeons' treatment preferences for patients requiring nutritional support? A discrete choice experiment.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Barriers faced by surgeons in identifying and managing malnutrition in emergency general surgery: A qualitative study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel L AshmoreSchool of Medicine and Population Health, Faculty of Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4321-5613
Adil RashidSchool of Medicine and Population Health, Faculty of Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Timothy R WilsonDepartment of General Surgery, Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK.
Vanessa HallidaySchool of Medicine and Population Health, Faculty of Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Matthew J LeeSchool of Medicine and Population Health, Faculty of Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9971-1635
University of Sheffield · GBDoncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency general surgery practice is high risk. Surgery is a key part of treatment, with resultant catabolic stress and frequent need for nutritional support. The aim of this study was to examine the current methods of defining and determining malnutrition in emergency general surgery. This included examining the use of nutrition screening and assessment tools and other measures of malnutrition.

methodsMEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, trial registries, and relevant journals published between January 2000 and January 2022 were searched for studies of adult patients with any emergency general surgery diagnosis, managed conservatively or operatively, with an assessment of nutritional status. Mixed populations were included if more than 50 per cent of patients were emergency general surgery patients or emergency general surgery results could be separately extracted. Studies in which patients had received nutritional support were excluded. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42021285897).

resultsFrom 6700 studies screened, 324 full texts were retrieved and 31 were included in the analysis. A definition of malnutrition was provided in 23 studies (75 per cent), with nutritional status being determined by a variety of methods. A total of seven nutrition screening tools and a total of nine 'assessment' tools were reported. To define malnutrition, the most commonly used primary or secondary marker of nutritional status was BMI, followed by albumin level.

conclusionWide variation exists in approaches to identify malnutrition risk in emergency general surgery patients, using a range of tools and nutrition markers. Future studies should seek to standardize nutrition screening and assessment in the emergency general surgery setting as two discrete processes. This will permit better understanding of malnutrition risk in surgical patients.

Indexed as

MalnutritionAdultHumansNutritional StatusRegistriesSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID37749757
PMCPMC10519817
OpenAlexW4387004758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.