Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37749646›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2023

Factors influencing pharmacists and pharmaceutical scientists' membership in professional organisations: an international survey.

Louisa Sullivan, Jun Ni Ho, You Zhuan Lee, Garba Mohammed Khalid, Anisha Kaur Sandhu, Sherly Meilianti, Farah Aqqad, Renly Lim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Louisa SullivanInternational Pharmaceutical Federation, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Jun Ni HoQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, 5000, Australia.
You Zhuan LeeSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia.
Garba Mohammed KhalidPharmaceutical Engineering Group, School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Anisha Kaur SandhuMonash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
Sherly MeiliantiInternational Pharmaceutical Federation, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Farah AqqadInternational Pharmaceutical Federation, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Renly LimInternational Pharmaceutical Federation, The Hague, The Netherlands. renly.lim@unisa.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4135-2523
University of South Australia · AUInternational Pharmaceutical Federation · NLMonash University Malaysia · MYOregon Health & Science University · USQueen's University Belfast · GBUniversiti Sains Malaysia · MYUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Australian National Health and Medical Research Council APP1156368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProfessional organisations exist as international or national organisations, with each country establishing at least one national professional association. There remains a knowledge gap about factors that influence professional organisational involvement of pharmacists and pharmaceutical scientists. This study aims to explore the motivators and barriers of pharmacy professionals holding organisation membership from a global perspective.

methodsAn online questionnaire was developed and disseminated between May and July 2021. The survey was open to all pharmacists and pharmaceutical scientists. The survey consisted of four sections; demographic information, questions about professional organisations, about the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) and its impact on the members. Data were analysed descriptively.

resultsA total of 1033 complete survey responses were received and included in the analysis. Of all respondents, 761 (73.7%) respondents were current members of a professional organisation and 272 (26.3%) were not members of any professional organisation. Overall, findings demonstrated networking, education, training and professional development opportunities as the main interests and anticipated activities, while the lack of clarity or need to join organisation, time, and financial constraints as the main barriers of pharmacy professionals holding membership. The majority of FIP members are satisfied with current FIP activities, and anticipate further networking opportunities, educational resources and grants made available to members.

conclusionsUnderstanding the perceptions and needs, as well as factors that influence engagement of pharmacists and pharmaceutical scientists is the key to enhancing membership. Professional organisations are highly encouraged to strengthen and target activities according to the identified motivators and barriers.

Indexed as

Health personnelNeeds assessmentPharmaceutical societiesPharmacistsProfessional organisations

Identifiers

PMID37749646
PMCPMC10521542
OpenAlexW4387025276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.