Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37749643›Full record

ReviewMilitary Medical Research2023

Deep learning-based lung sound analysis for intelligent stethoscope.

Dong-Min Huang, Jia Huang, Kun Qiao, Nan-Shan Zhong, Hong-Zhou Lu, Wen-Jin Wang

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Military Medical Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
18.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Audio-based digital biomarkers in diagnosing and managing respiratory diseases: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dong-Min HuangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, Guangdong, China.
Jia HuangThe Third People's Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518112, Guangdong, China.
Kun QiaoThe Third People's Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518112, Guangdong, China.
Nan-Shan ZhongGuangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, China State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, China. nanshan@vip.163.com.
Hong-Zhou LuThe Third People's Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518112, Guangdong, China. luhongzhou@fudan.edu.cn.
Wen-Jin WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, Guangdong, China. wangwj3@sustech.edu.cn.
Shenzhen Third People’s Hospital · CNSouthern University of Science and Technology · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auscultation is crucial for the diagnosis of respiratory system diseases. However, traditional stethoscopes have inherent limitations, such as inter-listener variability and subjectivity, and they cannot record respiratory sounds for offline/retrospective diagnosis or remote prescriptions in telemedicine. The emergence of digital stethoscopes has overcome these limitations by allowing physicians to store and share respiratory sounds for consultation and education. On this basis, machine learning, particularly deep learning, enables the fully-automatic analysis of lung sounds that may pave the way for intelligent stethoscopes. This review thus aims to provide a comprehensive overview of deep learning algorithms used for lung sound analysis to emphasize the significance of artificial intelligence (AI) in this field. We focus on each component of deep learning-based lung sound analysis systems, including the task categories, public datasets, denoising methods, and, most importantly, existing deep learning methods, i.e., the state-of-the-art approaches to convert lung sounds into two-dimensional (2D) spectrograms and use convolutional neural networks for the end-to-end recognition of respiratory diseases or abnormal lung sounds. Additionally, this review highlights current challenges in this field, including the variety of devices, noise sensitivity, and poor interpretability of deep models. To address the poor reproducibility and variety of deep learning in this field, this review also provides a scalable and flexible open-source framework that aims to standardize the algorithmic workflow and provide a solid basis for replication and future extension: https://github.com/contactless-healthcare/Deep-Learning-for-Lung-Sound-Analysis .

Indexed as

Deep LearningStethoscopesArtificial IntelligenceHumansReproducibility of ResultsRespiratory SoundsRetrospective StudiesDeep learningLung sound analysisRespiratory sounds

Identifiers

PMID37749643
PMCPMC10521503
OpenAlexW4387032904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.