Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37749616›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2023

Tyrosine-kinase inhibitor combined with iodine-125 seed brachytherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to transarterial chemoembolization: a propensity-matched study.

Yongjian Guo, Jingqiang Wu, Licong Liang, Kangshun Zhu, Jingwen Zhou, Liteng Lin, Ye Chen, Bihui Cao, Mingji He, Hui Lian and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yongjian Guo *Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jingqiang Wu *Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Licong Liang *Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Kangshun ZhuDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jingwen ZhouDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Liteng LinDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ye ChenDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Bihui CaoDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Mingji HeDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Hui LianDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Wensou HuangDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. huangwensou@126.com.
Mingyue CaiDepartment of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. cai020@yeah.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1155-9638
Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

Chen Xiao-Ping Foundation for the Development of Science and Technology of Hubei Province CXPJJH11900009-01Chen Xiao-Ping Foundation for the Development of Science and Technology of Hubei Province CXPJJH1200008-03Clinical Featured Technology Program of Guangzhou 0F04022Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project 202002030135Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project 202102010082Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project 202102020393National Natural Science Foundation of China 81873920National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172043Plan on Enhancing Scientific Research in GMU 2023.198Wu Jieping Medical Foundation 320.6750.2020-10-63Wu Jieping Medical Foundation 320.6750.2022-09-2Young Innovative Talents Program of Guangdong Institutions of Higher Learning 2020KQNCX057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the efficacy and safety of tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) combined with iodine-125 seed brachytherapy (TKI-I) versus TKI alone for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) refractory to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

methodsData of patients with TACE-refractory HCC who received TKI (sorafenib or lenvatinib) or TKI-I from September 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. A propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to diminish potential bias. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP). Tumor responses and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were also compared between the two groups.

resultsA total of 132 patients were included in this study. Under PSM, 48 paired patients were selected for comparison. The median OS was 23.2 (95% CI 20.9-25.1) months in the TKI-I group versus 13.9 (95% CI 11.1-16.7) months in the TKI group (P < 0.001). The median TTP was 12.8 (95% CI 10.1-15.5) months in the TKI-I group versus 5.8 (95% CI 5.0-6.6) months in the TKI group (P < 0.001). Patients in the TKI-I group had higher objective response rate (68.8% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.001) and disease control rate (89.6% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.007) than those in the TKI group. The incidence and severity of TRAEs in the TKI-I group were comparable to those in the TKI group (any grade, 89.7% vs. 92.2%, P = 0.620; ≥grade 3, 33.8% vs. 32.8%, P = 0.902).

conclusionsTKI-I was safe and significantly improved survival over TKI alone in HCC patients with TACE refractoriness.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyCarcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsTyrosine Kinase InhibitorsHumansIodine RadioisotopesRetrospective StudiesTyrosineIodine-125Iodine RadioisotopesTyrosineTyrosine Kinase InhibitorsBrachytherapyCombined modality therapyHepatocellular carcinomaTherapeutic chemoembolizationTyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID37749616
PMCPMC10518921
OpenAlexW4387024693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.