Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37749568›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Exploring physician engagement in health care organizations: a scoping review.

Anna Prenestini, Rocco Palumbo, Roberto Grilli, Federico Lega

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Defining and Measuring Emergency Physician Productivity: Development of a Consensus-Based Productivity Index.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna PrenestiniDepartment of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods (DEMM) and Center of Research and Advanced Education in Health Administration (CRC HEAD), Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy. anna.prenestini@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1334-6476
Rocco PalumboDepartment of Management & Law, Università Degli Studi Di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3700-9511
Roberto GrilliHealth Services Research, Evaluation and Policy Unit, Local Health Authority of Romagna, Ravenna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9425-7170
Federico LegaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health (SCIBIS) and Center of Research and Advanced Education in Health Administration (CRC HEAD), Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8862-8585

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleEnhancing health system effectiveness, efficiency, and appropriateness is a management priority in most world countries. Scholars and practitioners have focused on physician engagement to facilitate such outcomes.

objectivesOur research was intended to: 1) unravel the definition of physician engagement; 2) understand the factors that promote or impede it; 3) shed light on the implications of physician engagement on organizational performance, quality, and safety; and 4) discuss the tools to measure physician engagement.

methodA scoping review was undertaken. Items were collected through electronic databases search and snowball technique. The PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) statement and checklist was followed to enhance the study replicability.

resultsThe search yielded 16,062 records. After an initial screening, 300 were selected for potential inclusion in this literature review. After removing duplicates and records not meeting the inclusion criteria, full-text analysis of 261 records was performed, yielding a total of 174 records. DISCUSSION: Agreement on the conceptualization of physician engagement is thin; furthermore, scholars disagree on the techniques and approaches used to assess its implementation and implications. Proposals have been made to overcome the barriers to its adoption, but empirical evidence about implementing physician engagement is still scarce.

conclusionsOur scoping review highlights the limitations of the extant literature about physician engagement. Physician engagement is a relatively ill-defined concept: developing an evidence base for its actual implementation is necessitated to provide reliable guidance on how the governance of health care organizations could be improved. Although we did not assess the quality or the robustness of current empirical research, our findings call for further research to: 1) identify potential drivers of physician engagement, 2) develop dependable assessment tools providing health care organizations with guidance on how to foster physician engagement, and 3) evaluate engagement's actual impact on health care organizations' performance.

Indexed as

ChecklistPhysiciansConcept FormationDatabases, FactualDelivery of Health CareHumansClinicianEngagementHealth care organizationPerformancePhysicianQualityScoping review

Identifiers

PMID37749568
PMCPMC10521513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.