ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2023
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differentiation of adrenal metastases and adenomas based on clinical characteristics, deep learning features, and radiomics features derived from ultrasound imaging.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Adrenal metastases of differentiated thyroid cancer: clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- An interpretableFrontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Endocrinology application of molecular imaging: current role of PET/CT.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo assess the value of an
methodsA total of 303 patients who underwent
resultsThe predictive model included four risk factors: sex, the ratio of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of adrenal lesions to the mean liver standardized uptake value, the value on unenhanced CT (CTU), and the clinical stage of extra-adrenal malignancies. The model achieved an AUC of 0.936 with a specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of 0.918, 0.835, and 0.874 in the training dataset, respectively, while it yielded an AUC of 0.931 with a specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of 1.00, 0.735, and 0.851 in the testing dataset, respectively. The simplified scoring system had comparable diagnostic value to the predictive model in both the training (AUC 0.938, sensitivity: 0.825, specificity 0.953, accuracy 0.885; P = 0.5733) and testing (AUC 0.931, sensitivity 0.735, specificity 1.000, accuracy 0.851; P = 1.00) datasets.
conclusionsOur study showed the potential ability of a machine learning model and a simplified scoring system based on clinical and 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging features to predict AMs in patients with indeterminate adrenal nodules and extra-adrenal malignancies. The simplified scoring system is simple, convenient, and easy to popularize.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.