ReviewBMC medical imaging2023
Preoperative fistula diagnostics in male anorectal malformations after colostomy: a single-center experience.
Review in BMC medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate preoperative fistula diagnostics in male anorectal malformations (ARM) after colostomy are of great significance. We reviewed our institutional experiences and explored methods for improving the preoperative diagnostic accuracy of fistulas in males with ARMs after colostomy.
methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on males with ARMs after colostomy admitted to our hospital from January 2015 to June 2022. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and high-pressure colostogram (HPC) before anorectal reconstruction. Patients with no fistula as diagnosed by both modalities underwent a voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG). General information, imaging results and surgical results were recorded.
resultsSixty-nine males with ARMs after colostomy were included. Age at the time of examination was 52 ~ 213 days, and the median age was 89 days. The Krickenbeck classification according to surgical results included rectovesical fistula (n = 19), rectoprostatic fistula (n = 24), rectobulbar fistula (n = 19) and no fistula (n = 7). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy between MRI and HPC for different types of ARMs. For determining the location of the fistula, compared to surgery, HPC (76.8%, 53/69) performed significantly better than MRI (60.9%, 42/69) (p = 0.043). Sixteen patients diagnosed as having no fistula by MRI or HPC underwent a VCUG, and in 14 patients, the results were comfirmed. However, there were 2 cases of rectoprostatic fistula that were not correctly diagnosed.
conclusionHigh-pressure colostogram has greater accuracy than MRI in the diagnosis of fistula type in males with ARMs after colostomy. For patients diagnosed with no fistula by both methods, VCUG reduces the risk of false-negative exclusion, and rectoprostatic fistula should be considered during the operation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.