Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37749479›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied genetics2023

Field response and molecular screening of European wheat germplasm against powdery mildew at the Himalayan region of Pakistan.

Aamir Iqbal, Zia Ur Rehman, Muhammad Rameez Khan, Amir Muhammad Khan, Shahid Ullah Khan, Muhammad Arif, Javaid Iqbal, Mujeeb Ur Rehman, Minhaj Ali, Muhammad Qasim and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Aamir IqbalThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan. aamiriqbal890@aup.edu.pk.
Zia Ur RehmanThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Muhammad Rameez KhanThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Amir Muhammad KhanThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Shahid Ullah KhanThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Muhammad ArifThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Javaid IqbalDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Lakki-Marwat, 28420, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Mujeeb Ur RehmanThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Minhaj AliThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Muhammad QasimThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Imran AliThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Zakir Hussain FachoThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Muhammad HussainThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Ijlal HussainThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Jamshaid AhmadUniversity of Veterinary and & Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.
Sajid AliThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan. bioscientist122@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3915-7390

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wheat powdery mildew possesses a significant threat to wheat crops not only on a global scale but also in the northern region of Pakistan. Recognizing the need for effective measures, the exploration and utilization of exotic germplasm take on critical importance. To address this, a series of trials were made to investigate the response of 30 European (EU) lines, in addition to the local checks (Siran, Atta-Habib (AH) and Ghanimat-e-IBGE) against wheat powdery mildew at the Himalayan region of Pakistan. The study involved field testing from 2018 to 2022 across multiple locations, resulting in 38 different environments (location × year). In addition to field evaluations, molecular genotyping was also performed. The disease was absent on the tested lines during 2018, 2019, and 2020 whereas it ranged from 0 to 100% at Chitral location during 2021, where 100% was observed only for one EU wheat line "Matrix." The disease prevailed only at Gilgit location (0-60% for EU wheat line "F236") and at Nagar location (0-10% for EU wheat lines Substance and Nelson) during the disease season of 2022. Most of the EU wheat lines showed very low ACI values, due to an overall low disease pressure. Matrix showed the maximum ACI (1.54) followed by Ritter (1.25) and Bli_autrichion (0.87), whereas the minimum (0.1) was for Substance, JB_Asano, and KWS_Loft followed by Canon (0.19), all exhibiting partial resistance. The molecular marker-based screening revealed that Pm38 was the most prevalent and detected in 100% of wheat lines followed by Pm39 (60%) and Pm8 (30%). Six wheat lines (20%) possessed all three Pm genes (Pm8, Pm38, and Pm39) concurrently. The variability observed in this study can be utilized in future breeding efforts aimed at developing resistant wheat varieties.

Indexed as

AscomycotaTriticumDisease ResistancePakistanPlant BreedingPlant DiseasesEuropean germplasmExotic genetic resourcesField testingMolecular markers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.