ArticleBehavior research methods2024
Extrapolation of affective norms using transformer-based neural networks and its application to experimental stimuli selection.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emotion in English as a foreign language: Affective ratings for over 2,000 words by college learners.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Relations of social cognition with affective states: Insights from an expanded 2650-word database on warmth and competence.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Reducing social biases in text-based emotion prediction using semantic blinding and semantic propagation graph neural networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Extrapolated Persian Lexical Affect Norms (E-PLAN) from best-worst judgments of valence, arousal, dominance, and concreteness.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Child's play: A computational method for generating child-specific valence norms.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Contextual assembly of lexical functions in large language models.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Using large language models to estimate features of multi-word expressions: Concreteness, valence, arousal.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Emotion topology: extracting fundamental components of emotions from text using word embeddings.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data on the emotionality of words is important for the selection of experimental stimuli and sentiment analysis on large bodies of text. While norms for valence and arousal have been thoroughly collected in English, most languages do not have access to such large datasets. Moreover, theoretical developments lead to new dimensions being proposed, the norms for which are only partially available. In this paper, we propose a transformer-based neural network architecture for semantic and emotional norms extrapolation that predicts a whole ensemble of norms at once while achieving state-of-the-art correlations with human judgements on each. We improve on the previous approaches with regards to the correlations with human judgments by Δr = 0.1 on average. We precisely discuss the limitations of norm extrapolation as a whole, with a special focus on the introduced model. Further, we propose a unique practical application of our model by proposing a method of stimuli selection which performs unsupervised control by picking words that match in their semantic content. As the proposed model can easily be applied to different languages, we provide norm extrapolations for English, Polish, Dutch, German, French, and Spanish. To aid researchers, we also provide access to the extrapolation networks through an accessible web application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.