Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37749361›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025

Machine learning (ML) techniques to predict breast cancer in imbalanced datasets: a systematic review.

Arman Ghavidel, Pilar Pazos

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Transparent deep learning to identify autism spectrum disorders (ASD) in EHR using clinical notes.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arman GhavidelEngineering Management and Systems Engineering, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Pilar PazosEngineering Management and Systems Engineering, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA. MPazosLa@odu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge discovery in databases (KDD) is crucial in analyzing data to extract valuable insights. In medical outcome prediction, KDD is increasingly applied, particularly in diseases with high incidence, mortality, and costs, like cancer. ML techniques can develop more accurate predictive models for cancer patients' clinical outcomes, aiding informed healthcare decision-making. However, cancer prediction modeling faces challenges because of the unbalanced nature of the datasets, where there is a small minority category of patients with a cancer diagnosis compared to a majority category of cancer-free patients. Imbalanced datasets pose statistical hurdles like bias and overfitting when developing accurate prediction models. This systematic review focuses on breast cancer prediction articles published from 2008 to 2023. The objective is to examine ML methods used in three critical steps of KDD: preprocessing, data mining, and interpretation which address the imbalanced data problem in breast cancer prediction. This work synthesizes prior research in ML methods for breast cancer prediction. The findings help identify effective preprocessing strategies, including balancing and feature selection methods, robust predictive models, and evaluation metrics of those models. The study aims to inform healthcare providers and researchers about effective techniques for accurate breast cancer prediction.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMachine LearningData MiningFemaleHumansPrognosisCancerClassificationFeature selectionImbalanced dataResampling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.