Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37749313›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2023

Clinical performance of sealants under different humidity control conditions: a split-mouth 1-year randomized trial.

T V Cortez, E P Godoy, V L Paschoini, S A M Corona, M C Borsatto, A E Souza-Gabriel

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Sealant retention, patient satisfaction, and operator preference: a split-mouth randomised controlled trial comparing EasyPrepEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T V CortezDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo - Café Av,, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14040-904, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1490-1884
E P GodoyDepartment of Basic and Oral Biology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo - Café Av, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14040-904, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4555-6902
V L PaschoiniDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo - Café Av,, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14040-904, Brazil. vitoria.paschoini@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9233-1381
S A M CoronaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo - Café Av,, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14040-904, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1733-3472
M C BorsattoSchool of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1386-1590
A E Souza-GabrielDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo - Café Av,, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14040-904, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9280-2945
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 131684/2017-5Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 158114/2017-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSealants are an effective method of prevention and treatment for early caries lesions. This study analyzed the 1-year clinical performance of resin-based and ionomeric sealants applied to permanent teeth under different humidity conditions.

methodsThe investigation was a triple-blind randomized clinical trial (RCT) with a four arms split-mouth design, divided according to the sealant protocol: (1) Resin-based sealant applied with rubber dam isolation, (2) Resin-based sealant applied with cotton rolls isolation, (3) Ionomeric sealant applied with rubber dam isolation and (4) Ionomeric sealant applied with cotton rolls isolation. Fifty-eight patients started the study (232 teeth), and 47 (188 teeth) remained until the 1-year recall. The modified USPHS criteria were used in the analyzes to investigate surface texture, retention and the presence of secondary caries lesions around the sealants; in the following periods: baseline, after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months by two calibrated examiners. Data were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney and Friedman tests.

resultsThere was no difference between the types of sealants (p > 0.05). The type of humidity control influenced the superficial texture (p = 0.0012) and the retention of sealants (p = 0.0023). The sealant displacement was greater under cotton rolls isolation. Only one active caries lesion in enamel was found in the 9th month.

conclusionIt may be concluded that sealants effectively prevented caries, even when they were partially or totally lost, regardless of the material. The rubber dam isolation with a rubber dam promoted lower surface roughness and improved the retention rates. International Clinical Trials Registry Platform: #1111-1215-2832 (07/26/2018).

Indexed as

Dental CariesPit and Fissure SealantsDentition, PermanentHumansHumidityMolarPit and Fissure SealantsCariesClinical trialGlass ionomer cementResin-based sealSealants

Identifiers

PMID37749313
OpenAlexW4387012812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.