Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37749312›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Motivation moderates gender differences in navigation performance.

Victor R Schinazi, Dario Meloni, Jascha Grübel, Douglas J Angus, Oliver Baumann, Raphael P Weibel, Péter Jeszenszky, Christoph Hölscher, Tyler Thrash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Individual differences in navigation skill: towards reliable and valid measures.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Victor R SchinaziChair of Cognitive Science, Department of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. vschinaz@bond.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2345-2806
Dario MeloniChair of Cognitive Science, Department of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-0304-3118
Jascha GrübelChair of Cognitive Science, Department of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6428-4685
Douglas J AngusDepartment of Psychology, Bond University, Robina, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9722-2475
Oliver BaumannDepartment of Psychology, Bond University, Robina, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3976-5855
Raphael P WeibelChair of Cognitive Science, Department of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8854-7507
Péter JeszenszkyChair of Cognitive Science, Department of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0873-1743
Christoph HölscherChair of Cognitive Science, Department of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5536-6582
Tyler ThrashChair of Cognitive Science, Department of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3011-7029

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gender differences in navigation performance are a recurrent and controversial topic. Previous research suggests that men outperform women in navigation tasks and that men and women exhibit different navigation strategies. Here, we investigate whether motivation to complete the task moderates the relationship between navigation performance and gender. Participants learned the locations of landmarks in a novel virtual city. During learning, participants could trigger a top-down map that depicted their current position and the locations of the landmarks. During testing, participants were divided into control and treatment groups and were not allowed to consult the map. All participants were given 16 minutes to navigate to the landmarks, but those in the treatment group were monetarily penalized for every second they spent completing the task. Results revealed a negative relationship between physiological arousal and the time required to locate the landmarks. In addition, gender differences in strategy were found during learning, with women spending more time with the map and taking 40% longer than men to locate the landmarks. Interestingly, an interaction between gender and treatment group revealed that women in the control group required more time than men and women in the treatment group to retrieve the landmarks. During testing, women in the control group also took more circuitous routes compared to men in the control group and women in the treatment group. These results suggest that a concurrent and relevant stressor can motivate women to perform similarly to men, helping to diminish pervasive gender differences found in the navigation literature.

Indexed as

LearningMotivationFemaleHumansMaleReferral and ConsultationSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID37749312
PMCPMC10520045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.