Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37749278›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2024

Determination of highly polar anionic pesticides in beehive products by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry.

Florencia Jesús, Adrián Rosa García, Tommaso Stecconi, Víctor Cutillas, Amadeo Rodríguez Fernández-Alba

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Florencia JesúsDepartment of Chemistry and Physics, Agrifood Campus of International Excellence (ceiA3), University of Almeria, Ctra. Sacramento s/n, La Cañada de San Urbano, 04120, Almeria, Spain.
Adrián Rosa GarcíaDepartment of Chemistry and Physics, Agrifood Campus of International Excellence (ceiA3), University of Almeria, Ctra. Sacramento s/n, La Cañada de San Urbano, 04120, Almeria, Spain.
Tommaso StecconiChemistry Interdisciplinary Project (ChIP), School of Pharmacy, University of Camerino, Via Madonna delle Carceri, 62032, Camerino, Italy.
Víctor CutillasDepartment of Chemistry and Physics, Agrifood Campus of International Excellence (ceiA3), University of Almeria, Ctra. Sacramento s/n, La Cañada de San Urbano, 04120, Almeria, Spain.
Amadeo Rodríguez Fernández-AlbaDepartment of Chemistry and Physics, Agrifood Campus of International Excellence (ceiA3), University of Almeria, Ctra. Sacramento s/n, La Cañada de San Urbano, 04120, Almeria, Spain. amadeo@ual.es.
University of Almería · ESUniversità di Camerino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of highly polar pesticides is challenging due to their unique physicochemical properties, requiring specialized chromatographic techniques for their accurate and sensitive detection. Furthermore, the high level of co-extracted polar matrix components that can co-elute with the analytes can interfere with the analysis. Consequently, there is lack of pesticide monitoring data, as the European Food Safety Authority has pointed out. This article explores the overcoming of such difficulties in the analysis of these compounds. Analytical methodologies for the extraction, clean-up, and direct determination of 11 highly polar anionic pesticides, including glyphosate, glufosinate, ethephon, fosetyl-aluminium, and their related metabolites in complex food matrices such as honey and pollen by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry were successfully developed and validated. Solid-phase extraction and micro-solid-phase extraction employing strong anion exchange (SAX) cartridges were implemented for clean-up. The automation and miniaturization of SAX clean-up for these compounds were achieved for the first time. For method validation, SANTE/11312/2021 guideline was followed. Recoveries were between 70 and 120%, with RSDs below 20%. Limits of quantitation ranged from 0.005 to 0.020 mg kg

Indexed as

Pesticide ResiduesPesticidesAminobutyratesChromatography, LiquidHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsSolid Phase ExtractionTandem Mass SpectrometryAminobutyratesPesticide ResiduesPesticidesphosphinothricinAutomated µSPE clean-upHighly polar pesticidesHILICMass spectrometrySAX SPE clean-up

Identifiers

PMID37749278
OpenAlexW4387004239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.