Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37749274›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2023

Performances of ICT Toxoplasma IgG-IgM test in comparison with Vidas® toxo competition to determine the immune status against Toxoplasma gondii.

Sylvie Abraham, Raphael Piarroux, Ying Zhou, Vera Tesic, Ana Abeleda, Nadhira Houhou-Fidouh, Pascale Nicaise-Rolland, Luce Landraud, Rima McLeod, Sandrine Houzé

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sylvie AbrahamLaboratory of Parasitology, Toxoplasma National Reference Center, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, APHP Nord, 46 Rue Henri Huchard, 75018, Paris, France.
Raphael PiarrouxLD Bio Diagnostics, Lyon, France.
Ying ZhouDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Vera TesicDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ana AbeledaDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Nadhira Houhou-FidouhLaboratory of Virology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, APHP Nord, 46 Rue Henri Huchard, 75018, Paris, France.
Pascale Nicaise-RollandLaboratory of Immunology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, APHP Nord, 46 Rue Henri Huchard, 75018, Paris Paris, France.
Luce LandraudLaboratory of Microbiology, Louis Mourier Hospital, APHP Nord, 178 Rue Des Renouillers, 92700, Colombes, France.
Rima McLeodDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Sandrine HouzéLaboratory of Parasitology, Toxoplasma National Reference Center, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, APHP Nord, 46 Rue Henri Huchard, 75018, Paris, France. sandrine.houze@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9016-3847
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Chicago · USComité Champagne · FRHôpital Louis-Mourier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxoplasmosis is a ubiquitous parasitic infection caused by Toxoplasma gondii (Tg). In immunocompetent people, the infection may be asymptomatic with the induction of an immune response that may prevent reinfection or transmission to the fetus in immune pregnant woman. In immunocompromised persons or seronegative pregnant woman with a primary infection during pregnancy, the infection may result in the loss of life, sight, cognition, and motor function in the immune-compromised person or immunologically immature fetus. The objective of this study was to evaluate a new immunochromatographic test Toxoplasma ICT IgG-IgM (ICT) that allows detection of specific anti-Tg immunoglobulins G (Ig G) and M (Ig M). We included 1145 prospectively obtained sera and 376 samples selected for specificity or sensitivity studies. The performance of ICT was compared using Vidas® Toxo Competition (TXC) and Toxoscreen®. In case of discrepancy, Vidas® Toxo Ig G or Ig M and LDBIO Toxo II IgG western blot were used to establish definitive results by additional methods. Sensitivity and specificity of ICT were respectively 99.3% and 100%. In comparison, Toxoscreen®'s sensitivity was 100% and the specificity was 99.8%. TXC had a sensitivity of 98.7% with a specificity of 99.1%. ICT has excellent performance even for low Ig G titers, especially in immunocompromised patients, and confirms the specificity of isolated Ig M. This ICT provides reliable results easily and quickly. This screening technique is not designed to differentiate the Ig M from Ig G. When positive, additional tests may be necessary.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ProtozoanChromatography, AffinityImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MToxoplasmaToxoplasmosisAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, ProtozoanImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MConfirmatory techniqueIg G antibodiesIg M antibodiesImmunochromatographic testToxoplasmosis

Identifiers

PMID37749274
OpenAlexW4387005613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.