Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37749272›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2023

Sexual segregation results in pronounced sex-specific density gradients in the mountain ungulate, Rupicapra rupicapra.

Hendrik Edelhoff, Cyril Milleret, Cornelia Ebert, Pierre Dupont, Thomas Kudernatsch, Alois Zollner, Richard Bischof, Wibke Peters

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effective population size and NBMC ecology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hendrik EdelhoffWildlife Biology and Management Research Unit, Bavarian State Institute of Forestry, Freising, Germany. hendrik.edelhoff@lwf.bayern.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6354-8952
Cyril MilleretFaculty of Environmental Management and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Cornelia EbertSeq-IT GmbH & Co.KG, Department Wildlife Genetics, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Pierre DupontFaculty of Environmental Management and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Thomas KudernatschDepartment of Conservation and Biodiversity, Bavarian State Institute of Forestry, Freising, Germany.
Alois ZollnerDepartment of Conservation and Biodiversity, Bavarian State Institute of Forestry, Freising, Germany.
Richard BischofFaculty of Environmental Management and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1267-9183
Wibke PetersWildlife Biology and Management Research Unit, Bavarian State Institute of Forestry, Freising, Germany.
Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture · DENorwegian University of Life Sciences · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex-specific differences in habitat selection and space use are common in ungulates. Yet, it is largely unknown how this behavioral dimorphism, ultimately leading to sexual segregation, translates to population-level patterns and density gradients across landscapes. Alpine chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra r.) predominantly occupy habitat above tree line, yet especially males may also take advantage of forested habitats. To estimate male and female chamois density and determinants thereof, we applied Bayesian spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models in two contrasting study areas in the Alps, Germany, during autumn. We fitted SCR models to non-invasive individual encounter data derived from genotyped feces. Sex-specific densities were modeled as a function of terrain ruggedness, forest canopy cover, proportion of barren ground, and site severity. We detected pronounced differences in male and female density patterns, driven primarily by terrain ruggedness, rather than by sex-specific effects of canopy cover. The positive effect of ruggedness on density was weaker for males which translated into a higher proportion of males occupying less variable terrain, frequently located in forests, compared to females. By estimating sex-specific variation in both detection probabilities and density, we were able to quantify and map how individual behavioral differences scale up and shape spatial patterns in population density.

Indexed as

RupicapraAnimalsBayes TheoremFemaleGenotypeGermanyMaleSex Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID37749272
PMCPMC10520025
OpenAlexW4387015518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.