ReviewNPJ digital medicine2023
Collaborative Intelligence to catalyze the digital transformation of healthcare.
Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Critical evaluation of large language models for human cross-sectional anatomy identification: implications for collaborative intelligence.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- When better data meets better design: How EHR data usability and system usability shape physicians' cognitive load.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Feasibility of AI-simulated patients for tailored selection of diabetes remission prediction models in metabolic bariatric surgery: a proof-of-concept study.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- Clinical Obesity Through the Lens of Context-Aware Large Language Models.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- AI-assisted assessment of the IFSO consensus on obesity management medications in the context of metabolic bariatric surgery.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Collaborative Intelligence in Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: Integrating Human Expertise and Artificial Intelligence for Better Outcomes.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Leveraging digital pathology and AI to transform clinical diagnosis in developing countries.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- An Artificial Intelligence Pipeline for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Data to Treatment Recommendations.International journal of general medicine · 2025Review
- Use of Artificial Intelligence tools in supporting decision-making in hospital management.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of ChatGPT 4.0 in Telemedicine-Based Management of Metastatic Prostate Carcinoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Collaborative intelligence reflects the promise and limits of leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in clinical care. It involves the use of advanced analytics and computing power with an understanding that humans bear responsibility for the accuracy, completeness and any inherent bias found in the training data. Clinicians benefit from using this technology to address increased complexity and information overload, support continuous care and optimized resource allocation, and to enact efforts to eradicate disparities in health care access and quality. This requires active clinician engagement with the technology, a general understanding of how the machine produced its insight, the limitations of the algorithms, and the need to screen datasets for bias. Importantly, by interacting, the clinician and the analytics will create trust based on the clinician's critical thinking skills leveraged to discern value of machine outputs within clinical context. Utilization of collaborative intelligence should be staged with the level of understanding and evidence. It is particularly well suited to low-complexity non-urgent care and to identifying individuals at rising risk within a population. Clinician involvement in algorithm development and the amassing of evidence to support safety and efficacy will propel adoption. Utilization of collaborative intelligence represents the natural progression of health care innovation, and if thoughtfully constructed and equitably deployed, holds the promise to decrease clinician burden and improve access to care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.