Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37749215›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A novel combined intelligent algorithm prediction model for the risk of the coal and gas outburst.

Zhie Wang, Jingde Xu, Jun Ma, Zhuowen Cai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhie WangSchool of Management Engineering, Capital University of Economics and Business Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China. 12021210006@cueb.edu.cn.
Jingde XuInstitute of Higher Education, North China Institute of Science and Technology, Langfang, 065000, Hebei, China. xujd1450@ncist.edu.cn.
Jun MaSchool of Management Engineering, Capital University of Economics and Business Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China.
Zhuowen CaiSchool of Safety Science and Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, 232001, Anhui, China.
Capital University of Economics and Business · CNAnhui University of Science and Technology · CNNorth China Institute of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No. 51874134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanism of coal and gas outburst disasters is perplexing, and the evaluation methods of outburst disasters based on various sensitive indicators often have some imprecision and fuzziness. With the concept of accurate and intelligent mining in coal mines proposed in China, selecting quantifiable parameters for machine learning risk prediction can avoid the deviation caused by human subjectivity, and improve the accuracy of coal and gas outburst prediction. Aiming at the shortcomings of the support vector machine (SVM) such as low noise resistance and being prone to be influenced by parameters easily, this research proposed a prediction method based on a grey wolf optimizer to optimize the support vector machine (GWO-SVM). To coordinate the global and local optimization ability of the GWO, Tent Chaotic Mapping and DLH strategies were introduced to improve the optimization ability of the GWO and reduce the local optimal probability. The improved prediction model IGWO-SVM was used to predict the coal and gas outburst. The results showed that this model has faster training speed and higher classification prediction accuracy than the SVM and GWO-SVM models, which the accuracy rate reaching 100%. Finally, to obtain the correlation between the parameters of the coal and gas outburst prediction parameters, the random forest algorithm was used for training, and the three parameters with the highest feature importance were selected to rebuild the data set for machine learning. The accuracy of the IGWO-SVM outburst prediction model based on Random Forest was still 100%. Therefore, even if some prediction parameters are missing, the outburst can still be effectively predicted by using the RF-IGWO-SVM model, which is beneficial for the model application and underground safety management.

Identifiers

PMID37749215
PMCPMC10520021
OpenAlexW4387019465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.