ArticleScientific reports2023
A novel combined intelligent algorithm prediction model for the risk of the coal and gas outburst.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction of coal and gas outbursts based on physics informed neural networks and traditional machine learning models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Study on coal and gas outburst prediction technology based on multi-model fusion.Frontiers in big data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The mechanism of coal and gas outburst disasters is perplexing, and the evaluation methods of outburst disasters based on various sensitive indicators often have some imprecision and fuzziness. With the concept of accurate and intelligent mining in coal mines proposed in China, selecting quantifiable parameters for machine learning risk prediction can avoid the deviation caused by human subjectivity, and improve the accuracy of coal and gas outburst prediction. Aiming at the shortcomings of the support vector machine (SVM) such as low noise resistance and being prone to be influenced by parameters easily, this research proposed a prediction method based on a grey wolf optimizer to optimize the support vector machine (GWO-SVM). To coordinate the global and local optimization ability of the GWO, Tent Chaotic Mapping and DLH strategies were introduced to improve the optimization ability of the GWO and reduce the local optimal probability. The improved prediction model IGWO-SVM was used to predict the coal and gas outburst. The results showed that this model has faster training speed and higher classification prediction accuracy than the SVM and GWO-SVM models, which the accuracy rate reaching 100%. Finally, to obtain the correlation between the parameters of the coal and gas outburst prediction parameters, the random forest algorithm was used for training, and the three parameters with the highest feature importance were selected to rebuild the data set for machine learning. The accuracy of the IGWO-SVM outburst prediction model based on Random Forest was still 100%. Therefore, even if some prediction parameters are missing, the outburst can still be effectively predicted by using the RF-IGWO-SVM model, which is beneficial for the model application and underground safety management.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.