Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37749114›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

FGF-23 is a biomarker of RV dysfunction and congestion in patients with HFrEF.

Jan Benes, Katerina Kroupova, Martin Kotrc, Jiri Petrak, Petr Jarolim, Vendula Novosadova, Josef Kautzner, Vojtech Melenovsky

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07272395 (Monitoring Right Ventricular Function in Patients Undergoing Implantable Cardiac Electronic Device), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07272395 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Monitoring Right Ventricular Function in Patients Undergoing Implantable Cardiac Electronic Device (CIED) Therapy: A Multimodal Imaging and Biomarker-Based Approach

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorIstanbul University - CerrahpasaRan2025 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsRight Ventricular DysfunctionArmsMultimodal Right Ventricular Evaluation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jan BenesDepartment of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine-IKEM, Videnska 1958/9, 140 21 Praha 4, Prague, Czech Republic. jan.benes@ikem.cz.
Katerina KroupovaDepartment of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine-IKEM, Videnska 1958/9, 140 21 Praha 4, Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin KotrcDepartment of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine-IKEM, Videnska 1958/9, 140 21 Praha 4, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jiri PetrakBIOCEV, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Vestec, Czech Republic.
Petr JarolimDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Vendula NovosadovaInstitute of Molecular Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Josef KautznerDepartment of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine-IKEM, Videnska 1958/9, 140 21 Praha 4, Prague, Czech Republic.
Vojtech MelenovskyDepartment of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine-IKEM, Videnska 1958/9, 140 21 Praha 4, Prague, Czech Republic.
Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine · CZCharles University · CZBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCzech Academy of Sciences · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no biomarker reflecting right ventricular dysfunction in HFrEF patients used in clinical practice. We have aimed to look for a circulating marker of RV dysfunction employing a quantitative proteomic strategy. The Olink Proteomics Multiplex panels (Cardiovascular Disease II, III, Cardiometabolic, and Inflammation Target Panels) identified FGF-23 to be the most differentially abundant (more than 2.5-fold) in blood plasma of HF patients with severe RV dysfunction (n = 30) compared to those with preserved RV function (n = 31). A subsequent ELISA-based confirmatory analysis of circulating FGF-23 in a large cohort of patients (n = 344, 72.7% NYHA III/IV, LVEF 22.5%, 54.1% with moderate/severe RV dysfunction), followed by multivariable regression analysis, revealed that the plasma FGF-23 level was most significantly associated with RV dysfunction grade (p = 0.0004) and congestion in the systemic circulation (p = 0.03), but not with LV-ejection fraction (p = 0.69) or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, p = 0.08). FGF-23 was associated with the degree of RV dysfunction in both sub-cohorts (i.e. in patients with and without congestion, p < 0.0001). The association between FGF-23 and RV-dysfunction remained significant after the adjustment for BNP (p = 0.01). In contrast, when adjusted for BNP, FGF-23 was no longer associated with LV dysfunction (p = 0.59). The Cox proportional hazard model revealed that circulating FGF-23 was significantly associated with adverse outcomes even after adjusting for BNP, LVEF, RV dysfunction grade and eGFR. Circulating FGF-23 is thus a biomarker of right ventricular dysfunction in HFrEF patients regardless of congestion status.

Indexed as

Heart FailureVentricular Dysfunction, RightBiomarkersHumansPrognosisProteomicsStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID37749114
PMCPMC10520041
OpenAlexW4387018576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.