Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37748904›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Successful Change Management Strategies for Improving Diabetes Care Delivery Among High-Performing Practices.

Kevin A Peterson, Leif I Solberg, Caroline S Carlin, Helen N Fu, Rachel Jacobsen, Milton Eder

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin A PetersonDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, UMN Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota Peter223@umn.edu.
Leif I SolbergHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Caroline S CarlinDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, UMN Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Helen N FuPublic & Population Health Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Center for Biomedical Informatics, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Rachel JacobsenDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, UMN Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Milton EderDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, UMN Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
University of Minnesota Medical Center · USHealthPartners · USRegenstrief Institute · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

The Indiana Training Program in Public & Population Health InformaticsT15LM012502 · NLM · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Brian E. Dixon, William F Fadel · 2017 to 2026
$4.7M
Understanding Infrastructure Transformation Effects on Diabetes (The UNITED Study)R18DK110732 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CARLIN, CAROLINE S, PETERSON, KEVIN A · 2016 to 2021
$2.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK110732NLM NIH HHS T15 LM012502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo learn how the highest-performing primary care practices manage change when implementing improvements to diabetes care delivery.

methodsWe ranked a total of 330 primary care practices submitting practice management assessments and diabetes reports to the Understanding Infrastructure Transformation Effects on Diabetes study in 2017 and 2019 by Optimal Diabetes Care performance. We ranked practices from the top quartile by greatest annual improvement to capture dynamic change. Starting with the top performers, we interviewed practice leaders to identify their most effective strategies for managing change. Interview transcripts were qualitatively analyzed to identify change management strategies. Saturation occurred when no new strategies were identified over 2 consecutive interviews.

resultsTen of the top 13 practices agreed to interviews. We identified 199 key comments representing 48 key care management concepts. We also categorized concepts into 6 care management themes and 37 strategic approaches. We categorized strategic approaches into 13 distinct change management strategies. The most common strategies identified were (1) standardizing the care process, (2) performance awareness, (3) enhancing care teams, (4) health care organization participation, (5) improving reporting systems, (6) engaging staff and clinicians, (7) accountability for tasks, (8) engaging leadership, and (9) tracking change. Care management themes identified by most practices included proactive care, improving patient relationships, and previsit planning.

conclusionsTop-performing primary care practices identify a similar group of strategies as important for managing change during quality improvement activities. Practices involved in diabetes improvement activities, and perhaps other chronic conditions, should consider adopting these change management strategies.

Indexed as

Change ManagementDiabetes MellitusDelivery of Health CareHumansPrimary Health CareQuality Improvementdelivery of health carediabetes mellitus, type 2organizational cultureprimary health carequality of health care

Identifiers

PMID37748904
PMCPMC10519769
OpenAlexW4387006981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.