Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37748895›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Primary Care Research: Looking Back and Moving Forward With Reflections on NAPCRG's First 50 Years.

William R Phillips, Sarah Gebauer, Jacqueline K Kueper, Arturo Martinez-Guijosa, Maret Felzien, Tim C Olde Hartman, John M Westfall, Jennifer E DeVoe, Moira Stewart, Carol P Herbert and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Building capacity in the academic general practice research workforce.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

William R PhillipsDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington wphllps@uw.edu.
Sarah GebauerSaint Louis University-School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Jacqueline K KueperWestern University, Ontario, Canada.
Arturo Martinez-GuijosaNeighborhood House, Seattle, Washington.
Maret FelzienCommunity partner.
Tim C Olde HartmanRadboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
John M WestfallDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado (Retired).
Jennifer E DeVoeDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Moira StewartWestern University, Ontario, Canada.
Carol P HerbertDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, Ontario, Canada.
Larry A GreenUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Judith Belle BrownWestern University, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Neighborhood Barriers and Facilitators to Walking, the Epidemiology of Knee Osteoarthritis and Developing Effective Exercise PrescriptionsK23AR079035 · NIAMS · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI Sarah Gebauer · 2022 to 2026
$787k
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR079035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NAPCRG celebrated 50 years of leadership and service at its 2022 meeting. A varied team of primary care investigators, clinicians, learners, patients, and community members reflected on the organization's past, present, and future. Started in 1972 by a small group of general practice researchers in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, NAPCRG has evolved into an international, interprofessional, interdisciplinary, and intergenerational group devoted to improving health and health care through primary care research. NAPCRG provides a nurturing home to researchers and teams working in partnership with individuals, families, and communities. The organization builds upon enduring values to create partnerships, advance research methods, and nurture a community of contributors. NAPCRG has made foundational contributions, including identifying the need for primary care research to inform primary care practice, practice-based research networks, qualitative and mixed-methods research, community-based participatory research, patient safety, practice transformation, and partnerships with patients and communities. Landmark documents have helped define classification systems for primary care, responsible research with communities, the central role of primary care in health care systems, opportunities to revitalize generalist practice, and shared strategies to build the future of family medicine. The future of health and health care depends upon strengthening primary care and primary care research with stronger support, infrastructure, training, and workforce. New technologies offer opportunities to advance research, enhance care, and improve outcomes. Stronger partnerships can empower primary care research with patients and communities and increase commitments to diversity and quality care for all. NAPCRG offers a home for all partners in this work.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchDelivery of Health CareCanadaHumansPrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareUnited Statescommunity-based participatory researchfamily practicegeneral practiceinterdisciplinary researchNAPCRGorganizationsprimary careresearch

Identifiers

PMID37748895
PMCPMC10519759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.