Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37748509›Full record

ArticleKlinische Padiatrie2023

High Throughput Newborn Screening for Sickle Cell Disease - Application of Two-Tiered Testing with a qPCR-Based Primary screen.

Joachim Janda, Sebastian Hegert, Jessica Bzdok, Rafael Tesorero, Ute Holtkamp, Siegfried Burggraf, Elfriede Schuhmann, Friedrike Hörster, Georg F Hoffmann, Nils Janzen and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Klinische Padiatrie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Sickle Cell Disease.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. [Development of analytics in newborn screening-from the Guthrie card to genetics].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joachim Janda *Department of General Pediatrics, Division of Neuropediatrics and Metabolic Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg Center of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6293-0831
Sebastian Hegert *Screening-Laboratory Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Jessica BzdokLaboratory Becker & Colleagues, Munich, Germany.
Rafael TesoreroDepartment of General Pediatrics, Division of Neuropediatrics and Metabolic Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg Center of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1636-0954
Ute HoltkampScreening-Laboratory Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Siegfried BurggrafLaboratory Becker & Colleagues, Munich, Germany.
Elfriede SchuhmannLaboratory Becker & Colleagues, Munich, Germany.
Friedrike HörsterDepartment of General Pediatrics, Division of Neuropediatrics and Metabolic Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg Center of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Heidelberg, Germany.
Georg F HoffmannDepartment of General Pediatrics, Division of Neuropediatrics and Metabolic Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg Center of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nils JanzenScreening-Laboratory Hannover, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2313-3311
Jürgen G OkunDepartment of General Pediatrics, Division of Neuropediatrics and Metabolic Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg Center of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marc BeckerLaboratory Becker & Colleagues, Munich, Germany.
Jürgen DurnerLaboratory Becker & Colleagues, Munich, Germany.
Becker Technologies (Germany) · DEHeidelberg University · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSickle cell disease (SCD) is a group of hemoglobinopathies with a common point mutation causing the production of sickle cell hemoglobin (HbS). In high-throughput newborn screening (NBS) for SCD, a two-step procedure is suitable, in which qPCR first pre-selects relevant samples that are differentiated by a second method.

methodsThree NBS centers using qPCR-based primary screening for SCD performed a laboratory comparison. Methods using tandem MS or HPLC were used for differentiation.

resultsIn a benchmarking test, 450 dried blood samples were analyzed. Samples containing HbS were detected as reliably by qPCR as by methods established for hemoglobinopathy testing. In a two-step screening approach, the 2

conclusionIn high-throughput NBS for SCD, qPCR is suitable to focus 2

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellInfant, Newborn, DiseasesHemoglobin, SickleHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornNeonatal ScreeningHemoglobin, Sickle

Identifiers

PMID37748509
PMCPMC10635756
OpenAlexW4387007177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.