Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37747880›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2023

Variable microbiomes between mosquito lines are maintained across different environments.

Anastasia Accoti, Shannon Quek, Julia Vulcan, Cintia Cansado-Utrilla, Enyia R Anderson, Angel Elma I Abu, Jessica Alsing, Hema P Narra, Kamil Khanipov, Grant L Hughes and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Intrinsic factors driving mosquito vector competence and viral evolution: a review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anastasia AccotiDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston Texas, United States of America.
Shannon QuekDepartments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Topical Disease, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Julia VulcanDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston Texas, United States of America.
Cintia Cansado-UtrillaDepartments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Topical Disease, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Enyia R AndersonDepartments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Topical Disease, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Angel Elma I AbuDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston Texas, United States of America.
Jessica AlsingDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Hema P NarraDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Kamil KhanipovDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
Grant L HughesDepartments of Vector Biology and Tropical Disease Biology, Centre for Neglected Topical Disease, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Laura B DicksonDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7540-1189

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T001240/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/V011278/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/W018446/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/X018024/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The composition of the microbiome is shaped by both environment and host in most organisms, but in the mosquito Aedes aegypti the role of the host in shaping the microbiome is poorly understood. Previously, we had shown that four lines of Ae. aegypti harbored different microbiomes when reared in the same insectary under identical conditions. To determine whether these lines differed from each other across time and in different environments, we characterized the microbiome of the same four lines of Ae. aegypti reared in the original insectary and at another institution. While it was clear that the environment influenced the microbiomes of these lines, we did still observe distinct differences in the microbiome between lines within each insectary. Clear differences were observed in alpha diversity, beta diversity, and abundance of specific bacterial taxa. To determine if the line specific differences in the microbiome were maintained across environments, pair-wise differential abundances of taxa was compared between insectaries. Lines were most similar to other lines from the same insectary than to the same line reared in a different insectary. Additionally, relatively few differentially abundant taxa identified between pairs of lines were shared across insectaries, indicating that line specific properties of the microbiome are not conserved across environments, or that there were distinct microbiota within each insectary. Overall, these results demonstrate that mosquito lines under the same environmental conditions have different microbiomes across microbially- diverse environments and host by microbe interactions affecting microbiome composition and abundance is dependent on environmentally available bacteria.

Indexed as

AedesMicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaMicrobial InteractionsMosquito VectorsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID37747880
PMCPMC10553814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.