Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37747639›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2023

Comparison of a New Scheimpflug Camera and Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomographer for Measurements of Anterior Segment Parameters.

Xiaomin Huang, Xuanqiao Lin, Yizhou Yang, Jinjin Yu, Jiacheng Wang, Kexin Li, Yiran Wang, Giacomo Savini, Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello, Xingtao Zhou and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xiaomin Huang *Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, No.19 Baoqing Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Xuanqiao Lin *Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yizhou Yang *Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jinjin YuEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, No.19 Baoqing Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Jiacheng WangEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, No.19 Baoqing Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Kexin LiEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, No.19 Baoqing Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Yiran WangEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, No.19 Baoqing Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Giacomo SaviniIRCCS Bietti Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Domenico Schiano-LomorielloIRCCS Bietti Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Xingtao ZhouEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, No.19 Baoqing Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Jinhai HuangEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, No.19 Baoqing Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200031, China. jinhaihuang@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9952-3175

Funding

Clinical Research Plan of SHDC SHDC2020CR1043BEYE & ENT Hospital of Fudan University High-level Talents Program 2021318Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning TP2022046Project of Shanghai Xuhui District Science and Technology 2020-015Shanghai Science and Technology 22S11900200Shanghai Science and Technology 23XD1420500The Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China 82271048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study evaluated the differences and agreement between a new Scheimpflug camera (Scansys) and a swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomographer (CASIA 2) for measurements of the anterior segment of the eye in normal subjects.

methodsThis prospective study included 84 eyes from 84 normal adult subjects who underwent three consecutive measurements with the Scansys and the CASIA 2 in random order. The mean keratometry (Km), astigmatism magnitude (AST), J

resultsNo statistically significant differences between the two devices were found for the anterior AST, anterior J

conclusionsIn terms of assessing parameters for the anterior segment, our study indicated that Scansys and CASIA 2 generally showed significant agreement. The two devices used in this study's assessment of all the parameters can be used interchangeably in refractive analysis.

Indexed as

AgreementAnterior segment parametersScheimpflug cameraSwept-source optical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID37747639
PMCPMC10640599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.