ReviewRheumatology international2023
High-resolution musculoskeletal ultrasonography and elastography for eosinophilic fasciitis diagnosis and follow-up: a case-based review.
Review in Rheumatology international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characteristics and factors associated with treatment response among patients with eosinophilic fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Rheumatology international · 2025Pooled it
- Layer-Specific Assessment of Dermal Thickness and Stiffness Using Shear Wave Elastography in Gynecologic Cancer-Related Lower-Limb Lymphedema: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Adjuvant-induced autoimmune syndrome (ASIA syndrome) and the role of sonography in its diagnosis: a case-based review.Rheumatology international · 2025Review
- Ultrasound Phenotype-Based Approach to Treatment Choice in Osteoarthritis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) remains a rare condition without precise diagnostic criteria due to common symptoms with other autoimmune diseases requiring broad differential diagnosis. This paper describes the use of high-resolution musculoskeletal ultrasonography and elastography in the diagnosis and follow-up of eosinophilic fasciitis through the case of a 56-year-old male patient. In addition to laboratory data, instrumental data, and biopsy, musculoskeletal ultrasonography (US) was used both in the diagnostic process and in the follow-up period for an objective assessment of the changes in the patient's condition and response to treatment. The US showed disorganization of the myofibrils adjacent to the superficial fascia, edema, and thickening of the fascia and subcutaneous edema. In addition, the use of shear-wave elastography (SWE) demonstrated significantly reduced skin elasticity. High-frequency musculoskeletal ultrasound in combination with SWE is an effective method both for the diagnosis of EF and for the follow-up of the changes occurring after therapy. Based on the fact that it can easily differentiate the substrate of involvement, such as skin, subcutaneous tissue, or muscle fascia, ultrasound can be used to distinguish EF from other skin and muscle diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.