ReviewAnnals of intensive care2023
Multidisciplinary expert panel report on fluid stewardship: perspectives and practice.
Review in Annals of intensive care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mortality effect of albumin fluid resuscitation in adults with septic shock: a systematic review and dual frequentist-bayesian meta-analysis of randomised trials.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline on fluid therapy in adult critically ill patients: Part 3-fluid removal at de-escalation phase.Intensive care medicine · 2025Guideline
- Timing of early water intake post-general anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of oral fluid in post-anesthesia care unit under ultrasound monitoring on postoperative recovery quality in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Trial
- Integrated haemodynamic monitoring of fluid responsiveness and fluid tolerance in critical care: from physiology to bedside applications.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Review
- Best evidence for fluid resuscitation nursing in hypovolemic shock patients in emergency care based on GRADE system.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2026Article
- Plasma Bicarbonate as a Determinant of Fluid-Induced Acid-Base Changes in Postoperative Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Intravenous fluid mismanagement: time for national stewardship and quality improvement.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Incorporating solitary supplementary prescribing practice into an Advanced Practitioner role: The experience of a dietetic-based Advanced Practitioner in intestinal failure.Intestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Although effective and appropriate fluid management is a critical aspect of quality care during hospitalization, the widespread adoption of consistent policies that ensure adequate fluid stewardship has been slow and heterogenous. Despite evidence-based guidelines on fluid management being available, clinical opinions continue to diverge on important aspects of care in this setting, and the consistency of guideline implementation is far from ideal. A multidisciplinary panel of leading practitioners and experts convened to discuss best practices for ongoing staff education, intravenous fluid therapy, new training technologies, and strategies to track the success of institutional fluid stewardship efforts. Fluid leads should be identified in every hospital to ensure consistency in fluid administration and monitoring. In this article, strategies to communicate the importance of effective fluid stewardship for the purposes of education, training, institutional support, and improvement of patient outcomes are reviewed and recommendations are summarized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.