ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Maintenance of the joint line and posterior condylar offset are the most notable variables for successful outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionControversy regarding which variables should be prioritized for better outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) exists. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the variables affecting RTKA outcomes. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively identified 87 RTKAs in 82 patients who were performed between March 2014 and February 2020. Range of motion (ROM), including flexion contracture (FC) and further flexion (FF), was analyzed according to the covariates. The covariates included mode of failure, joint line position, anteroposterior (AP) position, rotational alignment of the femoral component, and patellofemoral alignment. The differences between the final follow-up values of each RTKA variable and those of the native knee were evaluated. The clinical outcomes were evaluated.
resultsNo significant differences were observed between the joint line positions of the RTKA and native knees. The patellar and AP positions of the femoral component were restored to pre-TKA values. The femoral component had an external rotation of 2.78° compared with the native knee. In multivariable stepwise regression analysis, restoration of the adductor tubercle joint line and posterior condylar offset (PCO) were significant variables affecting ROM. Septic RTKA (33 knees) resulted in poor FF outcomes (p = 0.030) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index stiffness (WOMAC S) scores (p < 0.001), compared with aseptic RTKA (54 knees).
conclusionsRestoration of the joint line position and PCO are crucial factors for improved ROM in RTKA. Joint line elevation in RTKA resulted in worse ROM than joint line lowering. In addition, RTKA due to septic failure had inferior ROM and WOMAC S scores compared with RTKA due to aseptic failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37747547What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.