Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37747534›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

Condylar constrained and rotating hinged implants in revision knee arthroplasty show similar survivorship and clinical outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lenka Stroobant, Thijmen de Taeye, Paul Byttebier, Stefaan Van Onsem, Ewoud Jacobs, Arne Burssens, Jan Victor

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lenka StroobantDepartment Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium. Lenkastroobant9@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7483-7183
Thijmen de TaeyeDepartment Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Paul ByttebierDepartment Orthopaedic Surgery, ASZ Aalst, Aalst, Belgium.
Stefaan Van OnsemDepartment Orthopaedic Surgery, AZ Alma, Eeklo, Belgium.
Ewoud JacobsDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent, Belgium.
Arne BurssensDepartment Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Jan VictorDepartment Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BEAlma · BEOnze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital · BE

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek TBM project- T001620N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) ligament instability and bone defects might require more constraint implants such as a condylar constrained knee (CCK) or rotating hinged knee (RHK). When both implants are suitable, the choice remains controversial. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the survivorship and clinical outcome between CCK and RHK in revision TKA.

methodsSystematic literature research was performed. Studies analysing the clinical outcome and/or survivorship of CCK and/or RHK in revision TKA were included. Clinical outcomes included the Knee Society Score, both clinical (KSCS) and functional (KSFS), range of motion (ROM) and reoperations. Survival was defined as the time free from removal or revision of the femoral and/or tibial component.

resultsA total of 40 articles analysing 4.555 knees were included. Survival did not differ between RHK and CCK implants (p = 0.6058), with, respectively, 91.6% and 89.8% survival after 5 years. Postoperative KSCS and KSFS were, respectively, 79.2 (SD 10.7) and 61.1 (SD 21.8) for the CCK group. Similar scores were noted for the RHK group with a KSCS of 80.2 (SD 14.1) and KSFS of 58.5 (SD 17.3). Postoperative ROM was similar for CCK (105.3°, SD 17.1°) and RHK patients (104.1°, SD 16.9°).

conclusionThis meta-analysis revealed that both survivorship and clinical outcome are similar for CCK and RHK patients for whom both designs are technically suitable and indicated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisHumansKnee JointProsthesis DesignProsthesis FailureReoperationRetrospective StudiesSurvivorshipTreatment OutcomeCondylar constrained kneeMeta-analysisPROMsRevision total knee arthroplastyRotating hinged knee

Identifiers

PMID37747534
OpenAlexW4387002423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.