ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2023
Isolation and Characterization of Human Conjunctival Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Their Extracellular Vesicles.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exosomes in Corneal Homeostasis and Wound Healing.Current eye research · 2025Review
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes for Ocular Diseases: Therapeutic Mechanisms and Clinical Perspectives.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to isolate and culture human conjunctival mesenchymal stromal cells (Conj-MSCs) from cadaveric donor tissue, and to obtain and characterize their extracellular vesicles (EVs) and their effect on conjunctival epithelium. Methods: Stromal cells isolated from cadaveric donor conjunctival tissues were cultured and analyzed to determine whether they could be defined as MSCs. Expression of MSC markers was analyzed by flow cytometry. Cells were cultured in adipogenic, osteogenic, and chondrocyte differentiation media, and stained with Oil Red, Von Kossa, and Toluidine Blue, respectively, to determine multipotent capacity. EVs were isolated from cultured Conj-MSCs by differential ultracentrifugation. EV morphology was evaluated by atomic force microscopy, size distribution analyzed by dynamic light scattering, and EVs were individually characterized by nanoflow cytometry. The effect of EVs on oxidative stress and viability was analyzed in in vitro models using the conjunctival epithelial cell line IM-HConEpiC. Results: Cultured stromal cells fulfilled the criteria of MSCs: adherence to plastic; expression of CD90 (99.95 ± 0.03% positive cells), CD105 (99.04 ± 1.43%), CD73 (99.99 ± 0.19%), CD44 (99.93 ± 0.05%), and absence of CD34, CD11b, CD19, CD45 and HLA-DR (0.82 ± 0.91%); and in vitro differentiation into different lineages. Main Conj-MSC EV subpopulations were round, small EVs that expressed CD9, CD63, CD81, and CD147. Conj-MSC EVs significantly decreased the production of reactive oxygen species in IM-HConEpiCs exposed to H2O2 in similar levels than adipose tissue-MSC-derived EVs and ascorbic acid, used as controls. Conclusions: It is possible to isolate human Conj-MSCs from cadaveric tissue, and to use these cells as a source of small EVs with antioxidant activity on conjunctival epithelial cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.