Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37747262›Full record

ArticleAging2023

Complement and coagulation cascades pathway-related signature as a predictor of immunotherapy in metastatic urothelial cancer.

Zheng Gong, Yuming He, Xiao Mi, Chengcheng Li, Xiaoran Sun, Guoqiang Wang, Leo Li, Yusheng Han, Chunwei Xu, Wenxian Wang and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Zheng GongDepartment of Urology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China.
Yuming HeBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou 510300, China.
Xiao MiBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou 510300, China.
Chengcheng LiBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou 510300, China.
Xiaoran SunBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou 510300, China.
Guoqiang WangBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou 510300, China.
Leo LiBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou 510300, China.
Yusheng HanBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou 510300, China.
Chunwei XuInstitute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, China.
Wenxian WangDepartment of Clinical Trial, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou 310022, China.
Shangli CaiBurning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou 510300, China.
Liang WangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, China.
Zhongyuan LiuDepartment of Urology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China.
Burning Rock Biotech (China) · CNChina Medical University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University · CNZhejiang Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown efficacy in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC), however, only a small subset of patients could benefit from ICIs. Identifying predictive biomarkers of ICIs in patients with mUC is clinical meaningful for patient stratification and administration.

methodsClinical and transcriptomic data of mUC patients treated with ICIs from mUC cohort (IMvigor210 study) was utilized to explore the predictive biomarkers. LASSO Cox regression was performed to construct a predictive model. The predictive model was trained and tested in the mUC cohort, and then exploratively tested in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and melanoma cohorts in which patients also received ICIs regimens.

resultsThe differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in complement and coagulation cascades pathway (CCCP) were mainly enriched in non-responders of ICIs in the mUC cohort. A CCCP risk score was constructed based on the DEGs in CCCP. Patients with a low-risk score were more responsive to ICIs and had better overall survival (OS) than those with a high-risk score in the training set (HR, 0.38; 95%CI, 0.27-0.53, P<0.001) and the test set (HR, 0.34; 95%CI, 0.17-0.71, P=0.003). The association between the CCCP risk score and OS remained significant in the multivariable cox regression by adjusting PD-L1 expression and TMB (P<0.05). In addition, there was no difference for OS in the bladder cancer patients without ICIs (TCGA-BLCA cohort, HR, 0.76, 95%CI, 0.49-1.18, P=0.22), suggesting a predictive but not prognostic effect of the risk score. For the exploratory analysis, consistent results were observed that low-risk group showed superior OS in ccRCC cohort (HR, 0.52, 95%CI, 0.37-0.75, P<0.001) and melanoma cohort (HR, 0.27, 95%CI, 0.12-0.62, P=0.001).

conclusionsOur study showed that the CCCP risk score is an independent biomarker that predicts the efficacy of ICIs in mUC patients. The patients with a low-risk score tend to have a better response to ICIs and a longer life time probably due to the immune-activated TME. Further studies are needed to validate the clinical utility of the seven-gene signature.

Indexed as

Blood CoagulationComplement System ProteinsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisTranscriptomeBiomarkers, TumorComplement System ProteinsImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorscomplement and coagulation cascadesimmune checkpoint inhibitorpredictive biomarkerurothelial cancer

Identifiers

PMID37747262
PMCPMC10564431
OpenAlexW4386996844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.