Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37747258›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2023

Precision Anaesthesia: Advancing Patient-Centered Precision Care Through Repetitive Assessment of PROMs with the Safe Brain Initiative Approach

Başak Ceyda Meço, Ana Borda de Agua Reis, Joana Berger-Estilita, Karina Jakobsen, Neslihan Alkış, Finn Michael Radtke

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Brain health: A concern for anaesthesiologists and intensivists.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Başak Ceyda MeçoAnkara University Faculty of Medicine, İbn-i Sina Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-2951-9634
Ana Borda de Agua ReisUniversity of Lausanne, Department of Anaesthesia, Lausanne, SwitzerlandORCID 0000-0002-0064-4338
Joana Berger-EstilitaUniversity of Bern, Institute for Medical Education, Department of Anaesthesia; Hirslanden Salem-Spital, Institute of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Bern, SwitzerlandORCID 0000-0002-8695-4264
Karina JakobsenNykøbing Falster Hospital, Clinic of Anaesthesia, Nykøbing Falster, DenmarkORCID 0009-0002-6526-5424
Neslihan AlkışAnkara University Faculty of Medicine, İbn-i Sina Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-0469-2318
Finn Michael RadtkeNykøbing Falster Hospital, Clinic of Anaesthesia, Nykøbing Falster, DenmarkORCID 0000-0001-5260-5384
Ankara University · TRSjællands Universitetshospital, Nykøbing F. · DKUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article aims to introduce the Safe Brain Initiative (SBI) approach, focusing on collecting and leveraging Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to enhance patient-centred precision anaesthesia and prevent postoperative delirium (POD) and neurocognitive disorders (NCD). The SBI was implemented to systematically address the feedback gap in perioperative care by collecting and analysing real-world data. The initiative focuses on monitoring and preventing POD and NCD, providing effective anaesthesia care, assessing patient and team satisfaction, and evaluating environmental sustainability impact. Based on international guidelines, 18 core recommendations were established to address potential complications and challenges associated with anaesthesia. Preliminary results showed a notable reduction in POD and increased awareness among anaesthesia team members regarding PROMs. The SBI approach demonstrated significant benefits during emergency situations, such as the February 2023 earthquake in Turkey, by providing crucial support and comfort to victims requiring multiple surgical interventions. The SBI presents an innovative, cost-effective, and patient-centred approach to perioperative care. By integrating PROMs and systematic feedback mechanisms, the SBI aims to expedite the advancement of efficient, patient-centered precision perioperative care, improve patient outcomes, and elevate the quality of care. The initiative has shown promising results, and its adoption is growing globally. Collaboration among healthcare providers, researchers, and patients is crucial in shaping the future of anaesthesia practice and further improving patient outcomes. Turkish hospitals are encouraged to join the SBI to benefit from international collaborations and contribute to positive change in perioperative care standards. The SBI project significantly advances precision anaesthesia, emphasising personalised care and patient well-being.

Indexed as

Neurocognitive disorderspatient-centered perioperative carepatient-reported outcome measurespostoperative deliriumprecision anaesthesiasafe brain initiative

Identifiers

PMID37747258
PMCPMC10606742
OpenAlexW4387002173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.