Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37746637›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2023

Machine learning identifies a COVID-19-specific phenotype in university students using a mental health app.

Artur Shvetcov, Alexis Whitton, Suranga Kasturi, Wu-Yi Zheng, Joanne Beames, Omar Ibrahim, Jin Han, Leonard Hoon, Kon Mouzakis, Sunil Gupta and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Artur ShvetcovBlack Dog Institute, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Alexis WhittonBlack Dog Institute, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Suranga KasturiBlack Dog Institute, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Wu-Yi ZhengBlack Dog Institute, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Joanne BeamesBlack Dog Institute, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Omar IbrahimBlack Dog Institute, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jin HanBlack Dog Institute, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Leonard HoonApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Kon MouzakisApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Sunil GuptaApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Svetha VenkateshApplied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Helen ChristensenBlack Dog Institute, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jill NewbyBlack Dog Institute, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Black Dog Institute · AUDeakin University · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Advances in smartphone technology have allowed people to access mental healthcare via digital apps from wherever and whenever they choose. University students experience a high burden of mental health concerns. Although these apps improve mental health symptoms, user engagement has remained low. Studies have shown that users can be subgrouped based on unique characteristics that just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) can use to improve engagement. To date, however, no studies have examined the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on these subgroups. Objective: Here, we sought to examine user subgroup characteristics across three COVID-19-specific timepoints: during lockdown, immediately following lockdown, and three months after lockdown ended. Methods: To do this, we used a two-step machine learning approach combining unsupervised and supervised machine learning. Results: We demonstrate that there are three unique subgroups of university students who access mental health apps. Two of these, with either higher or lower mental well-being, were defined by characteristics that were stable across COVID-19 timepoints. The third, situational well-being, had characteristics that were timepoint-dependent, suggesting that they are highly influenced by traumatic stressors and stressful situations. This subgroup also showed feelings and behaviours consistent with burnout. Conclusions: Overall, our findings clearly suggest that user subgroups are unique: they have different characteristics and therefore likely have different mental healthcare goals. Our findings also highlight the importance of including questions and additional interventions targeting traumatic stress(ors), reason(s) for use, and burnout in JITAI-style mental health apps to improve engagement.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceMachine learningMental healthMobile applicationsUniversity students

Identifiers

PMID37746637
PMCPMC10511781
OpenAlexW4386575019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.