ArticleIndian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB2023
Reference Range of Plasma Fatty Acids in North Indian Pregnant Population.
Article in Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reference values for Fatty Acids (FAs) are not well defined in the Indian population. Therefore, it is critical to establish FAs reference range for the healthy non-pregnant and pregnant Indian population. The present multi-centric, and cross-sectional study determines the 95% reference interval for FAs in an apparently pregnant Indian population and compare it to the healthy non-pregnant women. Physicians identified 164 reference individuals as healthy (56 non-pregnant and 108 pregnant) at various government and private hospitals of northern India. The 95th and 97.5th percentile reference limits were used to estimate the 95 percentile of the reference distribution. The reference ranges observed for Alpha-linolenic acid (0.29-0.42%; 0.36-0.58%), Docosahexaenoic-acid (3.38-4.23%; 3.8-4.55%), Eicosapentaenoic-acid (1.24-1.76%; 1.09-1.62%), Docosapentaenoic-acid-3 (0.61-0.69%; 0.65-0.76%), Linoleic-acid (18.44-20.75%; 19.51-21.88%), gamma-linolenic-acid (0.24-0.35%; 0.32-0.42%), Eicosatrienoic-acid (0.26-0.32%; 0.34-0.39%), Arachidonic-acid (9.29-11.02%; 10.02-11.56%), Docosatetraenoic-acid (0.62-0.89%; 0.79-1.09%), Docosapentaenoic-acid-6 (0.23-0.31%; 0.33-0.41%), Eicosatrienoic-acid (1.17-1.41%; 1.43-1.74%), Eicosenoic-acid (0.28-0.38%; 0.37-0.49%), Nervonic-acid (1.39-1.69%; 1.41-1.74%), Palmitoleic-acid (1.17-1.58%; 2-2.66%), Oleic-acid (19.8-22.26%; 19.68-22.94%), Myristic-acid (1.16-1.68%; 0.82-1.3%), Palmitic-acid (20.05-21.8%; 20.7-22.43%), Stearic-acid (11.34-12.56%; 10.29-11.02%), Arachidic-acid (0.17-0.2%; 0.18-0.23%), Lignoceric-acid (0.81-1.08%; 0.77-1.08%),
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.