Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37746440›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Comparison of Antimicrobial Activity of Triple, Double, and Cefixime-Based Antibiotic Pastes Against Enterococcus Faecalis: An In Vitro Study.

Jyoti Thakur, Sumit Mohan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jyoti ThakurPedodontics & Preventive Dentistry, Smile Sure Dental and Orthodontic Center, Ranchi, IND.
Sumit MohanConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dental College, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), Ranchi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis

resultsAfter seven days of the experimental process, it was observed that the CFU count was highest in group I and lowest in group V. In a similar vein, after 14 days, the maximum decrease in CFU count was observed in Group V, while the least reduction in CFU count was observed in Group II. On intergroup comparison, it was found that the maximum decrease in CFU was noted in Group V, followed by Group IV, Group III, and Group II.

conclusionThe study results indicated that the cefixime-enriched antibiotic paste had the greatest antimicrobial effectiveness, while the double and triple antibiotic pastes offered superior antibacterial efficacy against

Indexed as

antibacterialcalcium hydroxidecefiximecolony forming units (cfu)double antibiotic pasteenterococcus faecalis (e. faecalis)triple antibiotic paste

Identifiers

PMID37746440
PMCPMC10517428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.