Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37746356›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Orthopedic Resident and Patient Perception of Electronic Medical Record Use During the Clinic Visit.

Chris Rwigema, William H Fang, Xiao Chen, Christina Lane, Ian A Jones, C Thomas Vangsness

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chris RwigemaDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
William H FangDepartment of Translational Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Los Angeles, USA.
Xiao ChenDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
Christina LaneSouthern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
Ian A JonesDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
C Thomas VangsnessDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The transition from paper charts to electronic medical records (EMRs) has resulted in greater efficiency and reduced medical errors. This study aimed to examine the perception of patients and orthopedic residents regarding computer use during the clinic visit. Methodology This study utilized a cross-sectional cluster design. Orthopedic resident physicians were given a one-time general pre-visit survey. Additional surveys were given to patients and resident physicians post-visit. Surveys included questions that assessed satisfaction and the perceived impact of computer usage on doctor-patient interactions. Logistic generalized estimating equations were run to determine if there was an association between patient response and clinician assessment, adjusting for repeated measures within clinicians. Results A total of 80 patients and 15 residents completed the surveys. Results from the physician pre-visit survey showed that more residents perceived the computer as having a "negative" (47%) than "positive" (26%) effect on their relationship with patients. According to the post-visit analysis, patients perceived the residents' use of the EMR as having an overall positive effect on their ability to establish a personal connection and having a positive effect on their ability to give them attention. Conclusions Overall, there was little correlation between patient and resident perception of the computer's effect on their relationship. Patients generally perceived the computer as having a positive effect on their interaction with the residents even when residents had a negative perception of the computer's effect on their interaction.

Indexed as

computer useelectronic medical recordsorthopedic resident physicianspatient perceptionsatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID37746356
PMCPMC10511670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.